My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062211
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 062211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:26:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/22/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that she also wanted to know if this would preclude the Commission from discussing <br />this property when comes back to the Commission and theoretically changing the <br />zoning designation to high density residential after having additional community <br />meetings. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan reiterated that he did not think it would preclude the Commission from having <br />that discussion. He indicated that the statement is correct that the community has not <br />been put on notice of this kind of change, like all the other properties have had the <br />benefit of. He indicated that the 5.3 acres could never be expanded to 11.5 acres <br />without going through the full, legal rezoning hearings with all the notification; however, <br />the reality is that once feedback is received from the HCD, staff will have a fairly <br />compressed timeframe to move on, digest the comments, incorporate them as staff <br />sees fit, and proceed with the rezonings. He noted that staff will do what is legally <br />required in terms of public hearings, and there may be the opportunity to do more <br />community outreach, but the timeframe will not be very long. <br /> <br />inquired if the converse is true, that if this were submitted to <br />the HCD with only 5.3 acres and the HCD is agreeable, the Commission would be able <br />to go back later on and add more acreage after holding community meetings. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that the HCD will only be interested in whether the City has met all the <br />requirements for what a Housing Element needs to contain and that the sites are <br />reasonable and that the City has met the acreages. He noted that the HCD has take <br />over a lot of the City's discretion, but it will not care about what the City does with the <br />remainder. <br /> <br />Chair Narum stated that the Commission could also designate all 11.5 acres at 30 units <br />per acre and forward it to the HCD, and in the meantime have potentially some <br />outreach. She noted that this would give the City some flexibility should the HCD deny <br />some of the other sites. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan stated that the Commission could do that. <br /> <br />Chair Narum added that then this would not require the City to rezone it. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan said that was correct. He noted that he does not know what the Council will <br />do, but it appears like the Commission will be sending the Council a larger list, and the <br />decision on which ones get rezoned will be done after the feedback from the Council is <br />received. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pentin inquired if, for purposes of the EIR, evaluating the property at <br />5.3 acres versus 11.5 acres needs to be considered. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that staff is putting the worst case scenario into the EIR. He noted <br />that this is easy to do because what is being proposed in all of the properties, with the <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2011 Page 21 of 33 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.