My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062211
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 062211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:26:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/22/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
especially because of the fact that the City does have a cap on its sewer capacity, <br />linking housing to jobs, and providing the opportunity for a partnership between <br />non-profit and for-profit market rate housing organizations. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank questioned if the City has other infrastructure capacities that have <br />not been identified, such as electrical, traffic, or fresh water capacities. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that both staff and the Growth Management Subcommittee have <br />started to brainstorm on those issues because losing the housing cap and having these <br />rezoning are quite a change over what has been done recently. He noted that the City <br />has a new situation and the needs to explore its existing ordinance, and also in the <br />context of the lawsuits and the outcome of those lawsuits. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan stated that with respect to traffic, the City has level-of-service standards it <br />uses which will not necessarily change. He noted, however, that the one that keeps <br />coming up is sewer because there is a finite capacity with the current infrastructure. He <br />indicated that staff wants to be sure and be very accurate about how far out into the <br />future the sewer capacity actually becomes a problem. He noted that it is not an <br />immediate problem; the City has not gotten to that point, and it will not be in the next ten <br />years, and might not be in the next ten years after that. He stated, however, that the <br />City does have a finite amount and has to plan accordingly for some future finite limit. <br />He added that in the not too distant future, the City will have a public dialogue with <br />respect to how far it is, based on certain growth rates the City anticipates. He indicated <br />that this is why a lot of these comments and suggestions are being recommended by <br />staff to be referred to the Growth Management Subcommittee as it must be a part of the <br />conversation. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan stated that he wanted to reassure Ms. Dennis that the affordable housing <br />component of the Growth Management conversation will most definitely be included. <br />He indicated that Steve Bocian runs the City's housing program and is one of senior <br />staff persons in the Subcommittee, and the Councilmembers themselves are very tuned <br />in to this issue as well. He noted that some of the suggestions made are quite specific <br />and make assumptions about what the outcome of the Growth Management <br />Subcommittee will be, and since the Subcommittee is not quite there yet, it is difficult to <br />deal with specific wording of policies and programs. He added that he thinks themes <br />will be incorporated, but it seems premature to get that specific at this point, and that is <br />why staff has asked that these be forwarded to the Subcommittee. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce requested Mr. Dolan to talk about the Growth Management <br />Subcommittee because a lot of people do not know what it is, what it does, and what its <br />timeline is. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson requested Mr. Dolan to discuss its composition as well. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2011 Page 11 of 33 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.