My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052511
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 052511
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:23:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/25/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
other. He noted that there is a wide variety of development scenarios that would be <br />allowed under the program and regulations. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams then described the various scenarios: <br /> stand-alone office building: integrated into the parking structure; could be four to <br />six stories; 85-foot height limit. <br /> residential buildings: five to seven stories; the suggested density could probably <br />be achieved in five stories at 65 feet high; range of 75 dwelling units per acre; <br />provides flexibility if developer wants an 85-foot high building. <br /> hotel: same overall height; might want to consider taller hotel as a portion of the <br />development, up to 10+ stories, because there is an important dimension to <br />hotels very visible sight, real landmark within the city, and also comes with <br />hotel tax dollars; provides flexibility to attract the right develop. <br /> some small stand-alone retail building: in the center, maybe associated <br />with/adjacent to hotel. <br /> parking structure: a big important component of the site; what the parking <br />structure should be needs to be articulated; develop design guidelines so the <br />structure looks like a building; consider siting, access, and trying to gain <br />circulation in an appropriate way. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams indicated that they have developed a set of design standards in an attempt <br />to address all this for parking, retail, and office. He stated that loading and access will <br />be really integrated into the buildings with the densities being considered. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams stated that the different development scenarios can happen in a variety of <br />different ways, noting that the different types of office, residential, and hotel buildings <br />can be utilized as key uses throughout the site. He indicated that he did not want to go <br />too extensively into numbers but would like instead to provide the parameters of an <br />overall scenario of what it will be like for an all-office, all-residential, or all mixed-use <br />development component. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams noted that the key aspect on this is not what the final number is, but the <br />evaluation. He indicated that taking the regulations in the same way on all three of the <br />options, a stand-alone BART parking structure allows a certain amount of development, <br />approximately 375,000 square feet of office; a multi-use parking structure immediately <br />provides an additional amount of development and uses up the development site; and <br />the third option with the two multi-use structures would yield more development <br />potential, although the footprints might look the same. He pointed out that this is the <br />incentive in doing a multi-use structure versus a stand-alone structure. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams stated that the same goes with residential development, moving from <br />500 units to 580, from 620 units to 700, because parking actually begins to be the <br />critical governing factor on the development potential. He noted that residential <br />developments all have a lower traffic-generating rate than the office component which is <br />something that occurs now and may be a little bit different if it is not the end of the line <br />station, where the traffic peak periods would be different to a certain amount. He then <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 25, 2011 Page 9 of 21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.