Laserfiche WebLink
ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: Commissioners Narum, Pentin. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Blank. <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-2011-08 approving PCUP-289 was entered and approved as <br />motioned. <br /> <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> <br />a. PREV-781, David and Francine Cunningham <br />Work session to review and receive comments on a Preliminary Review <br />application to demolish the existing residence located at 205 Neal Street <br />and to construct a new, approximately 1,862 square-foot, two-story <br />residence. Zoning for the property is R-1-6,500 (One-Family Residential) <br />District. <br /> <br />stated that he owned property in the area and recused himself <br />due to a conflict of interest. <br /> <br />Natalie Amos presented the staff report and described the scope, layout, and key <br />elements of the proposal. She noted that staff distributed a memo to the Commission <br />adding a seventh discussion question to Exhibit A of the staff report. <br /> <br />Chair Narum inquired if a lot split is being proposed for the property. <br /> <br />Ms. Amos said no. <br /> <br />Chair Narum inquired what would be required if the Commission approved the proposal <br />and then a lot split is applied for. <br /> <br />Ms. Amos replied that it would have to meet the minimum standard for R-1-6,500 <br />zoning, which requires a minimum lot size of 6,500-square-foot lot for a one-family <br /> <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Dave Cunningham, property owner, stated that he and his wife have operated their <br />business on Main Street for nine years and plan on moving from their current residence <br />to reside in this home. He indicated that he had reviewed the plans with businesses <br />and residents in the area and noted that every neighbor on Second Street fully supports <br />the project. He noted that they received over 60 letters of support, including one from <br />206 Neal Street and the corner home, the two most visually impacted by the proposed <br />plan. He added that the Pleasanton Downtown Association (PDA) Design and <br />Beautification Committee fully endorsed the plans as well. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, April 13, 2011 Page 3 of 19 <br /> <br />