My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 041311
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 041311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:18:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/13/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Chair Narum stated that she generally like the design and would like to see the footprint <br />of the first floor expanded a bit so the second floor could be stair-stepped in, particularly <br />on the west side. She indicated that she would support extending things more out into <br />the street if the second floor could be reduced. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce suggested that given the concerns about massing, actual story <br />poles be erected on the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Cunningham stated that they can try and work with moving more of the house <br />downstairs to reduce the second floor. He noted that pushing the garage back would <br />affect the first floor and hinder reduction of the second-story massing. He stated that <br />wants to address all the concerns and have a nice home there. He added that he has <br />no intent of putting anything on the property that does not fit and would devalue the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mr. Huff referred to setbacks and noted that vehicle sizes once affected setbacks. He <br />stated that setbacks were predominantly 20 when they were <br />increased to 23 feet. He added that he knows through experiences with other projects <br />in Downtown neighborhoods that they can average the setbacks of other homes to <br />address setback concerns. <br /> <br />With respect to story poles, Mr. Huff noted that the 25-foot height occurs at the tip of the <br />hip roof, which is 20 feet away from where the story ladder is located. He added that in <br />this sense, the height is only 18 feet as it gets closer to the property line and not a <br />massive wall as depicted by Mr. Bourg. <br /> <br />As regards the low inventory of homes in historic neighborhoods, Mr. Huff asked that <br />others be allowed to share the same experience people in these neighborhoods are <br />experiencing with their historic homes. He also questioned how the proposal would <br />detract from all of the neighbors around the site when only one neighbor has spoken <br />tonight. <br /> <br />Mr. Huff referred to the garage and stated that if it were located in the back, a driveway <br />of about 12 feet would be needed, which will cut the width of the house down in the front <br />to about 18 to 20 feet. He noted that the garage is in the front also because of site <br />limitations. <br /> <br />Mr. Huff indicated they would be happy to install story poles. He noted that historic <br />studies cost anywhere from $4,000 to $5,000, and while familiar with shadow studies, <br />he is unsure of their cost. He voiced concern about adding costs and requiring studies <br />and suggested that computer images be utilized instead. He indicated that he hoped he <br />has proven himself with respect to attention to details based on his other projects in <br />town. He concurred with the statement that the carriage home housed soldiers during <br />WWII, indicating that the home is one of many homes in the City that provided rooms. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, April 13, 2011 Page 17 of 19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.