PC 041311 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chair Narum stated that one reason the Commission wants a historic evaluation is to find out whether the building is a contributing resource. She noted that if the expert returns and indicates that the house is a contributing resource, she will have a tough time with its demolition; however, if the expert says it is not a contributing resource, she would no problem with its demolition. Commissioner Pentin stated that based on the presentations that have been made, he has heard no one say that the house has value and should not be demolished. Commissioner Pearce stated that she would much prefer to see this house be retained and expanded in an architecturally and historically appropriate way. She indicated that she does not think she has enough information at this time to ascertain whether or not demolition is appropriate based on a historic evaluation or a structural integrity evaluation. She stated, however, that if she were asked if she preferred demolition or some kind of add-on, she would generally opt for an addition, if possible, as she always prefers to keep the existing structure in an older neighborhood if it has integrity and can be fit in within the grand scheme. Commissioner Pentin noted that the Commission also heard comments that they do not want to have the front of the cottage remain the same with a big box at the back. Commissioner Olson added that a contractor indicated it would need to be close to being torn down to improve on it, and that sounds like a demolition. Commissioner Pearce agreed with the statement but indicated that she cannot rely on it as she has no facts to support the statement. She expressed appreciation for more information. Commissioner Olson countered that the statements were made by someone who has built homes, a contractor who has done a lot of remodeling and construction work in this town. Chair Narum commented that if this to be relied upon, then there is no need to have the historic evaluation done. She noted that the expert may come back with additional information that indicates there were significant events that occurred at this cottage to make it a contributing resource. Commissioner Olson replied that in that case, it would be different, but what exists on the property right now does not add a lot of value to the neighborhood. Commissioner Pentin agreed that with information the Commission has tonight, he cannot say yes, but he cannot say no either because there is not sufficient information. He noted that this is a workshop, and based on what has been presented and the information at hand, he can say yes. PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, April 13, 2011 Page 14 of 19