PC 041311 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Pentin noted that comments were made that the house does not have much by way of historical significance. He inquired if the reference to soldiers staying in the cottage during WWII would bring the house to a level of historical status. Commissioner Pearce agreed and added that she would prefer to have an objective opinion of a qualified expert to not only speak to whether or not important things happened there but also to the historic integrity of the house, the historic attributes of the architectural style, and other things of that nature. She indicated that her answers No. 2 7. Commissioner Pentin stated that the comments made by the PHA indicate that they are not really opposed to the demolition of the house but rather, to the size of the house being proposed. He inquired if this would then need to be taken to the next step on historical review. Commissioner Pearce stated that if the structure is being demolished, it would be helpful to have more than less information in making the decision. She emphasized that this is an important decision that needs to be made with as much information as possible. Chair Narum agreed. She recalled the Commissionsupport the demolition of the house on Stanley Boulevard partly because of the integrity of the historic homes around it was gone. She noted that in this neighborhood, it is essential that the Commission understand the contribution of every house or garage if demolition is going to be considered. She indicated that she believes this should be done by an independent specialist. Commissioner Pentin added that it could also be someone who meets the Secretary of the InteriorOffice standards. Commissioner Olson agreed. There was consensus among the Commissioners that it is necessary to have an independent historic evaluation to be done by a qualified expert. Mr. Dolan stated that since Question No. 7 was brought before the Commission only this evening, he wanted to make sure that the Commission understood the question in its entirety. He advised the Commission that it has discretionary action here and CEQA will apply. He indicated that if the Commission wants an independent study done, the expert should be asked the second question which does not relate to house itself. He stated that there is another potential issue not addressed in the staff report, which is, if it is possible that what would be built there would have a significant adverse effect on a PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, April 13, 2011 Page 12 of 19