My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 041311
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 041311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:18:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/13/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Pentin referred to massing and size and asked Mr. Cunningham whether <br />1,800 square feet will suit their needs. <br /> <br />Mr. Cunningham stated that the proposed house is a 1,862-square-foot, two-bedroom, <br />two-bath home; the other house was at 1,200 square feet with one bedroom. He <br />indicated that they have a son, and a daughter and grandson who will visit, and he <br />wants to be able to use at least one bedroom and a pull out couch when they visit. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce referred to the points made about the purpose of the FAR and <br />she asked Mr. Dolan to speak to the purpose of an FAR. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan explained that FAR is a crude measurement of building intensity and mass, <br />and there is a tendency to rely on it probably too much. He stated that it gives some <br />indication of the mass of the building space relative to the land area, and it is also a <br />reflection of the intensity of a use on a site. He noted that sometimes it has limited <br />usefulness; for example, garage space is exempted from FAR which sometimes defeats <br />its purpose. He noted that that one could have the same FAR on a piece of property <br />designed one way and would have a completely different look in terms of mass if <br />designed another way. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson inquired how FAR relates to mass and whether it more truly <br />relates to footprint. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that it relates to total floor area. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pentin noted that front yard setback was originally 23 feet and now it is <br />20 feet. He inquired where 23 feet came from and if it was it established as such for <br />many years or if this is something the City just wants to do in order to push the house <br />farther back from the street. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he did not know the evolution or history behind this change and <br />he referred the question to Steve Otto. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto replied that the Municipal Code had a 20-foot front yard setback <br />and he understands that given cars were getting larger, the City bumped the setback an <br />additional three feet in order to handle these larger vehicles. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pentin noted that side yard separations have also been reduced from ten <br />feet to eight feet and asked Mr. Otto if this is something that was also set in the past. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto replied that he does not recall the actual evolution or thought behind setting <br />10 feet between two one-story homes and 17 feet between one-story and two-story <br />homes. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, April 13, 2011 Page 10 of 19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.