My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
071911
>
16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2011 4:47:06 PM
Creation date
7/12/2011 4:47:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Review the City's condominium conversion ordinance to identify desirable <br /> changes such as potentially requiring more affordable units and longer tenant <br /> noticing requirements, to minimize the impact and displacement of lower income <br /> tenants (Program 8.5); <br /> • Conduct a review of the City's Growth Management Program and amend as <br /> necessary to assure the rate of residential development is consistent with the <br /> City's current and new infrastructure capacities (Program 9.1); <br /> • Complete rezoning and General Plan amendments necessary to accommodate <br /> the City's full share of the regional housing need (Program 11.1); <br /> • Assess the level of effort to overcome infrastructure constraints to affordable <br /> housing on a periodic basis (Program 14.6); <br /> • Review the City's Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance for consistency with Housing <br /> Element goals, to identify incentives for non-profit housing developers, to <br /> encourage the development of larger residential units, and to determine if it is <br /> appropriate to increase the percentage of units affordable to lower income <br /> households (Program 16.2); <br /> • When allocating the City's Lower Income Housing Fund, consider whether a joint <br /> non-profit/for-profit development should be a higher priority due to the ability to <br /> secure better funding and be developed (Program 17.5); <br /> • Require as many affordable units as feasible to incorporate Universal Design <br /> standards to meet the needs of persons with disabilities and to allow for aging in <br /> place (Programs 41.2 and 41.8) <br /> • Referencing programs in other elements of the General Plan (Energy, Air Quality <br /> and Climate Change, Water, and Community Character) related to green building, <br /> and water and energy conservation, and eliminating several programs in the <br /> Housing Element related to these topics. <br /> • Explore the potential for utilizing the City's Lower Income Housing Fund for low- <br /> interest loans to support alternative energy usage and/or significant water <br /> conservation systems in exchange for securing housing units affordable to very <br /> low income and low income households (Program 44.2). <br /> Letters from EBHO and Citizens for a Caring Community: Public input on the Goals, <br /> Policies and Programs includes a letter dated June 21, 2011, from Peter Cohen, Policy <br /> Director of EBHO (East Bay Housing Organizations) and letters from Becky Dennis <br /> representing Citizens for a Caring Community, the latest of which is dated July 6, 2011. <br /> These letters are included in Attachment 11. In the letter from EBHO, Peter Cohen <br /> acknowledges the City's Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (IZO) but contends that reliance <br /> on the IZO alone will not result in the City achieving its housing goals. He asks that the <br /> City look at master planning larger development areas and identify larger joint <br /> development opportunity sites that would allow non-profit and for-profit housing <br /> developers to jointly develop housing projects. Staff proposes a new Program 45.5 <br /> whereby the City would work with the East Pleasanton Specific Plan property owners to <br /> secure a site for development of family housing by a non-profit housing developer. This <br /> program is included in Attachment 2. Mr. Cohen also asks for consideration of additional <br /> incentives for affordable housing which would capture some of the additional "windfall" <br /> value which would be conveyed on the property owner by the rezoning to residential. He <br /> Page 5 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.