My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
071911
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2011 3:29:06 PM
Creation date
7/12/2011 3:29:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PRZ-59/1623 Cindy Way <br /> Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy or 1,100iMT (metric tons) of CO,e(carbon dioxide equivalent)/yr <br /> or 4.6 or 4.6 MT of CO,e/SP (service population) /yr. (residents+employees). <br /> Source: BAAQMD, Adopted Air quality CEQA Thresholds of Significance—June 2010. <br /> a.-b.) The rezoning itself won't trigger greenhouse gas emission. The zoning will result in the <br /> relocation of the house which will generate greenhouse gas during relocation/construction. As such, <br /> the applicant will be required incorporate best management practices (BMPs) to reduce construction <br /> emissions. GHG emissions duo to construction of the proposed project are considered less-than- <br /> significant. The proposed rezoning may result in the development of seven new homes in the future. <br /> The Bay Area Air Quality Management District CEQA Guidelines (May 2011) provided screening <br /> criteria for criteria pollutants and precursors using the default assumptions used by the Urban Land Use <br /> Emissions Model (URBEMIS). It shows the following criteria for single-family development: <br /> Operation Criteria Operational GHG Construction Criteria <br /> Pollutant Screening Size Pollutant <br /> Screening Size Screening Size <br /> Single family 325 du (NOX) 56 du 114 du (ROG) <br /> The development the applicant intends to file later is a single-family development of seven homes. The <br /> project level is well under the screening size of the BAAQMD CEQA guidelines. However, at the time <br /> when the development is proposed, threshold of significance will he reviewed again to determine the <br /> level the impact at that time. <br /> Therefore, this would be a Less than Significant Impact. <br /> 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant Less Than No <br /> Significant with Mitigation Significant Impact <br /> Impact Incorporation Impact <br /> Would the project: <br /> a)Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment X <br /> through the routine transport,use,or disposal of hazardous <br /> materials? <br /> b)Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment X <br /> through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions <br /> involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? <br /> c)Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely X <br /> hazardous materials,substances,or waste within one-quarter mile <br /> of an existing or proposed school? <br /> d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous X <br /> materials sites compiled pursuant to Covenmrent Code Section <br /> 65962.5 and,as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the <br /> public or the environment? <br /> e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,where X <br /> such a Ian has not been ado.ted,within two miles of a public <br /> 12 7/8/2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.