My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
071911
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2011 3:29:06 PM
Creation date
7/12/2011 3:29:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PRZ-59/1623 Cindy Way <br /> The City of Pleasanton designates trees over 55 inches in circumference or more or than 35 feet in <br /> height as heritage trees subject to regulations governing their removal in the Pleasanton Municipal Code, <br /> Chapter 17.16: Tree Preservation. HortScience, Inc. surveyed the trees. Two heritage size trees, both <br /> are in good health, will be retained. The trees along the Arroyo Del Valle will be retained. Other trees <br /> and their condition would be analyzed with the future development application. <br /> Therefore, this would be a Less-than-Significant Impact. <br /> f.) There is no adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or other <br /> approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan and this is not applicable to this project. <br /> Therefore, this would be a No Impact. <br /> 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant with Less Than No <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant Impact <br /> Impact Incorporation Impact <br /> Would the project: <br /> a)Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a X <br /> historical resource as defined in§15064.5? <br /> b)Cause a substantial adverse change a the significance of X <br /> an archaeological resource pursuant to 515064.5? <br /> c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X <br /> resource or site or unique geologic feature? <br /> d)Disturb any human remains,includ ng those interred X <br /> outside of formal cemeteries? <br /> Environmental Setting <br /> The subject site abuts the Arroyo Del Valle on the north. <br /> Significance Criteria <br /> The impact questions above constitute the significance criteria for this environmental topic. The text <br /> below further explains and defines the significance criteria for impact question b). <br /> CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(c) applies to effects on archaeological sites. Effects on non-unique <br /> archaeological resources are not considered significant. Regarding unique archaeological resources, lead <br /> agencies may require that reasonable efforts be made to allow such resources to be preserved in place or <br /> left in an undisturbed state. 'I'o the extent that unique archaeological resources are not preserved in <br /> place or left undisturbed, Public Resources Code Section 21083.2 requires mitigation measures to protect <br /> such resources. Additionally, mitigation measures may be imposed to provide for archaeological sites <br /> discovered during construction. Generally, imposing mitigation measures would reduce archeological <br /> resource effects to a less-than-significant level. <br /> Discussion of Checklist Items <br /> a.-d.): There are no known archaeological or historical sites identified on the subject site. There could <br /> be previously undiscovered subsurface resources present. Should subsurface resources be found upon <br /> 9 7/8/2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.