My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
071911
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2011 3:29:06 PM
Creation date
7/12/2011 3:29:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PRZ-59/1623 Cindy Way <br /> site from A to PUD-MDR would maintain residential use of the site. Therefore, this would be a No <br /> Impact <br /> e.) The conversion of the±3 acres from agriculture zoning designation to a medium density <br /> residential zoning designation may result in the relocation of the existing home. Additionally, the <br /> applicant intends later file a MD development for seven single-family residential lots. This change of <br /> relocating the existing homes and a possible future development of additional home would maintain <br /> the existing residential use designation. Thus, the impact would be less than significant in that the <br /> existing site is not currently used for agriculture purpose. Therefore, this would be a Less-than- <br /> Significant Impact. <br /> 3. AIR QUALITY <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant with Less Than No <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant Impact <br /> Impact Incorporation Impact <br /> Where available,the significance criteria established by the <br /> applicable air quality management or air pollution control <br /> district may be relied upon to make th<following <br /> determinations. Would the project: <br /> a)Conflict with or obstruct implemen_ation of the X <br /> applicable air quality plan? <br /> b)Violate any air quality standard or c antribute substantially X <br /> to an existing or projected air quality violation? <br /> c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any X <br /> criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- <br /> attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air <br /> quality standard(including releasing emissions which exceed <br /> quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? <br /> d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X <br /> concentrations? <br /> e)Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X <br /> of people? <br /> Significance Criteria <br /> The significance criteria established by the Bay Area Air quality Management District (BAAQMD) is <br /> used to determine the significance of air quality impacts. A project would have a significant impact on <br /> air quality if the proposed project and uses would cause total criteria air pollutant emissions (i.e., from <br /> both stationary and mobile sources) to equal or exceed the following BAAQMD-defined thresholds: <br /> Reactive organics 54 lbs/day <br /> Nitrogen oxides 54 lbs/day <br /> Particulate matter (PMI„) 82 lbs/day <br /> According to the BAAQMD Guidelines, a project that would individually have a significant air quality <br /> impact would also be considered to have a significant cumulative air quality impact. No regulatory <br /> agency has adopted standards of significance with regard to toxic air emissions from mobile sources. <br /> 6 7/8/21)11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.