My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
071911
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2011 3:29:06 PM
Creation date
7/12/2011 3:29:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
H, "A" zoning changed to "PUD-MDR" c <br /> ' Q>. <br /> a <br /> r. s , - <br /> so. G. <br /> i/ <br /> f jF uw <br /> �� 4 E" hl say so <br /> PUD—MDR \ ,a,, ,�, ��. mo ��L. <br /> u <br /> (o. (�9) .v, <br /> -0, i <br /> --- <br /> PUD-MD <br /> <_, v. -.-3` (0 1031) <br /> Site Plan with Current Zoning Designations <br /> With the approval of the rezoning from A to PUD-MDR, the applicant intends to subdivide <br /> the existing four-acre site into two lots: one lot that would have the existing home for 13,000 <br /> square feet and one lot for 3.7 acres. This would require a subsequent parcel map <br /> application2. The applicant also intends to relocate to the existing home closer to the <br /> driveway, remodel the existing home, and construct a new garage. The relocation and <br /> remodel is part of the PUD minor modification, and the process of which was previously <br /> explained. As for the large 3.7-acre lot, a further subdivision and PUD development plan <br /> would be proposed, as described in more detail later, as "Future Development of <br /> Remainder Parcel." <br /> 2) Design Review (PDR-965) for 1619 Cindy Way (Lot 9, Tract 7534) <br /> When PUD-38 was approved, the approval included a set of pre-designed homes and each <br /> lot had an approved house design, except for Lot 9. Lot 9 at that time was set aside as a <br /> home that would have customized design. Condition of Approval No. 2 of PUD-38 states: <br /> The custom home on Lot 9 shall conform to the approved design guidelines, and the <br /> design shall attempt to mitigate neighbor concerns; the home shall be processed as <br /> a design review application and shall be subject to review and approval by the <br /> Planning Commission. <br /> In review of the meeting minutes, staff believes that this condition was at the request of the <br /> Jones as related to potential visual and privacy impacts as Lot 9 abuts the then Jones <br /> property on the east. As Mr. Jansen now owns both Lot 9 and the former Jones property, <br /> this issue is no longer germane. <br /> 2 A two-lot subdivision does not require the review and approval by the Planning Commission. It is reviewed and <br /> approved by the Director of Community Development. <br /> Case No. PUD-38-03M Planning Commission <br /> Page - 7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.