My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
071911
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2011 3:29:06 PM
Creation date
7/12/2011 3:29:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of PUD-38 development, a rezoning to change the existing A zoning designation to PUD- <br /> MDR is required. Additionally, Mr. Jansen proposes to modify condition No.24Tract 7534 <br /> for continued use of the existing driveway. <br /> N sS f' `�°,0`) ` 5, -Ma4 `'r <br /> C) 1 k .1‘5:' 'At,�I�EZ S III <br /> 1 M 1 Pt1D-MDR <br /> \\\\ +e:g (0.1331) <br /> ■ <br /> 1 �e.11 5541 5543 •550 ^ <br /> L i LL <br /> /1019 <br /> 161.E 5591 C ? 5530 <br /> r 15,7i1 <br /> 1610 1611 5521 <br /> / 5520 1520 1— <br /> 1851 i 1E68 / ::_ 5511 <br /> / 6510 1510 • <br /> I <br /> ...d It: . <br /> Je w <br /> II . , •-i • C ----—- — <br /> Adjoining Rosalyn Estates (PUD-38) and the Proposed Site <br /> Mr. Jansen has also applied for a minor modification to PUD-38 to allow second floor <br /> windows on the rear elevation of 1635 Cindy Way (Lot 7, Tract 7534) and to merge the <br /> former Jones property (1623 Cindy Way) as part of Roselyn Estates and be managed by <br /> the existing homeowners association, subject to the rules and regulations of PUD-38 <br /> development plan approval. Staff is currently processing this modification. The Director of <br /> Community Development takes action on PUD Minor Modification applications with the <br /> Planning Commission and the City Council being notified of the action on a Zoning <br /> Administrator Action Report. Action by the Planning Commission is not necessary unless <br /> the Planning Commission has concerns with the application. <br /> Case No. PUD-38-03M Planning Commission <br /> Page - 4 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.