My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
071911
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2011 2:56:42 PM
Creation date
7/12/2011 2:56:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
developers to review sites that scored high, particularly those relating to funding mechanisms, <br /> and staff would work to provide opportunities and financial support. <br /> Councilmember McGovern asked if the City looked at inclusionary low income housing funds <br /> and other cities to determine whether funds are equal to funds and the local cities around <br /> Pleasanton. Ms. Stern said staff has not to date. Councilmember McGovern suggested this be <br /> done, stating a study was done two years ago in updating the City's fees. <br /> Ms. Stern concluded her report and said she was available for questions. <br /> Councilmember McGovern said she has not compared the new document to the old Housing <br /> Element to see what is new and what is not. She asked if staff had a red-lined version. Ms. <br /> Stern said staff is creating a red-lined version and can provide this to the Council. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan said he believes Attachment 6 addresses Councilmember McGovern's <br /> request, which is a Review and Assessment of the 2003 Housing Element Programs as of <br /> February 2011. Ms. Stern said the last column talks about some of the potential changes but <br /> staff is actually in the process of preparing a red-lined version to show the changes being <br /> suggested and will provide this to the Council. <br /> Mayor Hosterman opened public comment. <br /> Peter Cohen, East Bay Housing Organizations, thanked the Council for its proclamation in <br /> support of Affordable Housing Week. He said the task force process has been quite thorough <br /> thus far. The Housing Needs Analysis Report done in December by the consultant lays out a <br /> nice picture of the City and its needs for housing. He felt a forced march can lead to creative <br /> thinking and the City can be proud of the Hacienda process, as well. The site selection process <br /> is always tricky but important, and equally important are its programs and policies. While the <br /> State does not require cities to produce anything but rather plan and zone for it, there is an <br /> expectation that there is a roadmap to making these happen over time and to facilitate meeting <br /> the actual housing need. He provided staff with some ideas and suggestions and offered that <br /> their organization can serve to be a resource to the City. Lastly, affordable housing is about <br /> people, and affordability is relative to people's positions in life and needed for all. <br /> Becky Dennis said she was looking at past RHNA allocations for the number that said at least <br /> 15% of the City's housing would be affordable to low and very low income families. Historically, <br /> the City has allocated more, but she might be wrong. She asked for a policy that gives priority to <br /> proposals that come with partnerships between non-profits and for-profit developers. She also <br /> suggested looking at the experience of the non-profit in delivering services. While Pleasanton <br /> likes to do things with inclusionary zoning, it means that in making something affordable at 50% <br /> or below, with inclusionary housing if someone earns 45% of the median, they might not be able <br /> to rent the apartment and may need to leave the community. Therefore, the safety net is not <br /> there. Regarding growth management, there is only one area where infrastructure is finite— <br /> sewer capacity. Interestingly, in analyzing the numbers for 2025, residents will use 81% of all <br /> sewer capacity and business will only use 19%. This tells her that if the City wants to develop a <br /> growth management program, it should look at allocating sewer capacity to its obligation <br /> because the City will never be able to exceed the hard number in any case and also does not <br /> want to be sued to build another pipeline. <br /> Mayor Hosterman closed the public comemnt, and confirmed that staff will take comments and <br /> questions and fold it into the process. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 17 of 19 May 3, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.