My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
071911
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2011 2:56:42 PM
Creation date
7/12/2011 2:56:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
participation and as a collaborative developer, they would normally do this before the City would <br /> talk about densities. <br /> Mayor Hosterman asked if Mr. Trobbe has reached out to the neighborhood. Mr. Trobbe said in <br /> part; they have had some quick meetings after community meetings, he has exchanged emails <br /> with residents, and they have passed out business cards. In defense of the community, they <br /> may feel he is not "driving the car" but his hope is that in going through that process, they will <br /> have that opportunity and work together within the means of the settlement agreement. <br /> Vice Mayor Cook-Kallio said she was sorry the Chamber was now somewhat empty because <br /> she was going to ask the same question and agrees that more information is helpful. She <br /> pointed out that the map is incorrect in that the size of the site represents the amount of <br /> available acreage for development and not that which is only slated for high density. She asked <br /> that a map be developed for the true acreage proposed for high density. Mr. Trobbe said they <br /> have an aerial for Site 7 that shows specifically where Safeway begins and ends. <br /> Councilmember McGovern acknowledged Mr. Trobbe's vision for integrating greenery and open <br /> spaces with development and suggested he discuss this with the community, to which Mr. <br /> Trobbe agreed. <br /> Vamshi Palkanda requested that the three sites first adhere to the 40% burden first and then <br /> look for additional resources. He referred to traffic and said averaging traffic over a period of 24 <br /> hours is different than averaging it at the peak. He also asked that traffic studies be done during <br /> the time when the fair is open, stating that if two police officers are needed just to manage traffic <br /> during the fair, he could imagine the impact with 400 additional homes. He also asked that the <br /> Koll Center traffic signal area be considered as the main road adjoining any new community. <br /> Mayor Hosterman closed public comment, and suggested that Council provide its direction to <br /> staff after a short break. <br /> BREAK <br /> Mayor Hosterman called for a break at 9:35 p.m. and thereafter, reconvened the regular <br /> meeting at 9:43 p.m. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan said he is a member of the task force, has been involved since its <br /> inception, and recognized the difficulty of locating 2,000 units of high density housing per a court <br /> order. He thinks this is one of the best processes and effort from citizen participation and a task <br /> force the City has had. The sites the Council chooses must make sense from many aspects <br /> which have been identified and ranked using criteria. The task force spent a lot of time <br /> developing the criteria and included trying to spread out development as evenly throughout the <br /> community and not having one area taking the burden. Based on sites presented and <br /> comments received, he generally concurs with the draft sites the task force has proposed thus <br /> far, with a few exceptions. <br /> He agrees there is too much of a burden in Sites 8, 11 and 14, especially at the <br /> Valley/Stanley/Bernal corner, and this area needs reduction. If ACE came forward and was <br /> interested in putting a train station there and doing some TOD mixed use, it might make sense, <br /> but given existing infrastructure and traffic, it is too much for one area. He thinks Site 7 belongs <br /> on the list. The task force did reduce the unit count somewhat at their last meeting and he thinks <br /> development can be achieved to fit in with amenities of a park, open space, and greenery. It is a <br /> walk able area, near the freeway and it also has office already approved. He provided an <br /> City Council Minutes Page 12 of 19 May 3, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.