My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
051711
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2011 11:28:09 AM
Creation date
5/12/2011 11:28:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
districts. As the revenue has been cut year after year, the state has also been holding on to those <br /> revenues for longer periods of time. At our last board meeting, PUSD board passed a TRANs (Tax <br /> and Revenue Anticipation Note) for about $15M to offset what the state will be doing in regards to <br /> deferrals. <br /> Ms. Cazares shared how the deficit factor can be calculated and is included in the actual proposal <br /> that hits our district at about $400K. What if the taxes pass or they don't pass? The Governor told us <br /> what he proposes to do if the taxes pass, but hasn't shared with us if they don't pass. We have to <br /> come up with scenarios if this proposal doesn't hold true. She said that school districts use Dartboard. <br /> The purpose of the School Services of California, Inc.'s (SSC) Dartboard is to provide planning <br /> factors and recommendations for school agencies in California. The SSC Dartboard is revised several <br /> times each year to reflect changes in the State Budget and other factors. Their estimate was about <br /> $330/ADA, which was not based on any proposal anywhere. They have taken what would be the drop <br /> in the minimal guarantee for Prop. 98, which is about $2.3B, divided it by the state wide ADA of <br /> $6.2M to come up with $330/ADA. The Governor has not proposed this anywhere, no one has <br /> released anything, and it's a mathematical figure. In PUSD, we used the $371/ADA, and assumed the <br /> $400K drop for the COLA, which is about $28/ADA, so we have assumed $399/ADA reduction in <br /> revenue for our district. She explained OPEB (Other Post-Employment Benefits) Liability, which is <br /> about $674K/year. This is the third year in which we might have made a contribution. We made a <br /> contribution in the first year of zero, 50% in the second and third year and our goal is to make a 100% <br /> contribution in the upcoming fiscal year. OPEB can be described as"any benefit other than pension". <br /> At the request of Trustee Grant, she explained state reductions of the district and reminded everyone <br /> that the current fiscal year approved reductions of about$8.2M, which included $5.2M or concessions <br /> from all employee groups. The year before that about $11.2M was cut, which $1.2M came from <br /> categorical programs, such as Adult Education, which has been hit significantly. We currently flex or <br /> take about 80% of the revenue that is generated from the Adult Ed Programs for our adult population <br /> and are using them for K-12. Vice Mayor Cook-Kallio pointed out that some of these Adult Programs <br /> are offered to students who have not fulfilled requirements in their secondary schools. Ms. Cazares <br /> continued to review PUSD's Budget Solutions and highlighted three areas: reduce spending by cuts <br /> to programs and service of $3.5M and negotiated employee concessions. To enhance revenues by <br /> fundraising campaigns, which $660K was raised and were able to restore positions that were <br /> eliminated. We will be using our undesignated reserve of $1.9M as well as our Federal Education <br /> Jobs Act Funds of$2.7M and State Fiscal Stabilization Funds of$700K. <br /> Ms. Cazares highlighted the Fundraising Campaign and the positions that were restored, such as <br /> Technology Specialists at the Elementary and Middle School levels, and noted they will not have this <br /> funding for next year. She highlighted the next steps would be: we are currently in negotiations for <br /> concessions from our employee groups, the parcel tax election that's coming up in May, fundraising <br /> campaigns for the band/string position that was cut, plus CORE is in the planning stages, the May <br /> Revise or Budget Act and the Election and the tax extensions which will now get pushed to November <br /> from June. Superintendent Ahmadi noted that if the district hadn't been so careful and spent our <br /> undesignated reserves in October, we would have been in a much worse position. <br /> Trustee Bowser commented that one of the difficult things we did was cut the remedial programs for <br /> elementary students who need the supplemental instruction so they could have success during the <br /> regular school year. He shared concerns about the at risk students who might suffer the most from <br /> these cuts. <br /> Trustee Laursen noted that it's estimated that $600-700 per student could be cut, which we have <br /> planned for $400 per student with maybe adding approximately another $300. She shared how the <br /> Legislative Analyst Office (LAO) has suggested closing schools eight weeks early. We have no idea <br /> what will come out of Sacramento, but are working on the plan to place the district in the best <br /> possible position we can with the information that we receive and don't control at this time. <br /> Councilmember McGovern shared that when she was on the PUSD school board they worked hard <br /> for long term stable funding for education, however, it is repeating itself year after year. She <br /> Joint City Council and <br /> PUSD Board Minutes Page 4 of 7 March 28,2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.