Laserfiche WebLink
unless it is in substantial conformance with the Specific Plan. She indicated that while <br />there are many items in this proposed project on Stanley Boulevard that need a <br />tremendous amount of re-direction, the demolition of the house is unnecessary because <br />it is habitable although it is now uninhabited. She added that this would set a terrible <br />precedent leading to a very slippery slope of destruction of small street-side cottages, <br />homes, and rentals that are on property listed as high density in the heritage <br />neighborhoods. She pointed out that on page 68 of the DTSP, #7 very clearly states <br />that, ent should generally provide for the preservation and <br />rehabilitation of existing on-site street frontage homes which exceed 50 years of age or <br />which substantially contribute to the small town character of the neighborhood in terms <br />of architecture and sca <br /> <br />Ms. Krichbaum stated that a home does not need to be a perfect historic example or a <br />beautiful, maintained home to be valuable to the history and heritage of the City. She <br />noted that new homes, regardless of amenities, never look like older homes or have <br />their character, and new trees never really replace old trees either. She referred to the <br />Land Use map on page 18 of the DTSP and noted that most of the DTSP area is zoned <br />either Downtown Commercial or High Density Residential. She noted that Rose <br />Avenue, Harrison Street, Augustine Street, Peters Avenue, Division Street, and St. Mary <br />Street are blocks of small and interesting historic homes that are over 50 years old <br />which are valuable pieces of property. She added that if the mindset of the property <br />owners, City staff, and the Commission is for these homes to be demolished to make <br />way for the development of high density homes, the small-town character feel and look <br />of the eritage neighborhoods would be completely destroyed. She indicated that <br />there are examples in town of street-side older homes that are being preserved with the <br />construction of multiple-family units behind them. She noted that the PHA has <br />consulted with City staff on several proposals by local developers to leave the original <br />home, enhance it with a remodel, and build a moderate amount of homes behind it. <br /> <br />Ms. Krichbaum indicated her appreciation for the concern and effort put forth by City <br />staff, the Planning Commission, and the City Council to make this project the best it can <br />possibly be. She added that it is very important that historic areas be <br />preserved and enhanced as the Downtown commercial and residential areas, as well as <br />the future and feel of the Downtown, depend upon that. She concluded that this can be <br />achieved, but it takes community, political, and staff dedication, with respect and pride <br />for Pleas heritage as the point of consensus in these matters. <br /> <br />Linda Garbarino, President of the Pleasanton Heritage Association, spoke about the <br />character and integrity of historic neighborhoods. She stated that Stanley Boulevard is <br />one of the gateways into the City, and its historic integrity is slowly being eliminated due <br />to thoughtless demolition, as characterized by a leading historian in a report: a street <br /> She <br />commented that this is a critical statement for a historian to make about a city that <br />prides itself in its history. She questioned who was to blame for this loss of historic <br />inventory. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, February 9, 2011 Page 8 of 41 <br /> <br />