PC 020911 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Tolleson stated that would be a weird solution. He noted that whole reason for the 20-foot setback is to provide off-street parking, which has been provided here. He indicated that there is no reason for anybody to park in a shortened driveway, and the owners would pull into the garage if it were raining, which would be the only time they would need to go from the garage to the house. He added that based upon various weather conditions and typical use, the property has a unique set of conditions that effectively provide for equivalent compliance, and the intent of the Code is met in a way that is a little inventive. Commissioner Blank inquired how long the existing owners have lived in the property. Himani Limaye, property owner, replied that they have lived there for four years. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Blank referred to the application for building permit; Exhibit C, and noted that the estimated value is $1,200 including all material and labor. He inquired if this means the entire structure could be built for $1,200. Ms. Amos replied that this building permit was for when the existing garage was constructed. Commissioner Blank stated that the reason he asked how long ago the applicant has lived in the house is because disclosures tend to vary, depending on the age of the house. He noted that in the last ten years, the disclosures of property conditions are very, very complete. He indicated that he is hesitant because of the potential safety issue that goes with a setback that is too short. He added that he does not know how the City would enforce it and does not see it as an issue of anything other than safety. believes there are other solutions, although he does not know what it would do to a tree if permeable pavers were used to turn the driveway into the garage which would meet the Code and have off-street parking. He added that the garage could also be expanded which could provide access to the house without moving the driveway itself, and a hallway could also be added. He noted that this may not be a premium solution and would take some ingenuity in design if the owners wanted to enter down ten feet without adding onto the garage. He stated that he believes there are possibilities for other solutions which could be done besides demolishing the existing garage in order to build a new one. He added that moving it down 10 feet as opposed to 20 feet could accommodate a curved driveway which would turn into the garage from underneath the tree. Chair Narum suggested continuing the item. She noted that the applicant and the owners have heard the feedback and would provide an opportunity for them to think about it and return with other alternatives. She indicated that she has difficulty in supporting the plan as it is, and while she hears the applicant saying they will guarantee PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, February 9, 2011 Page 30 of 41