PC 020911 - Laserfiche WebLink

foundation, the house could also easily be moved to accommodate a driveway that would go back to the proposed units behind it. She indicated that preserving the house would be greener than demolishing it. Ms. Bourg stated that Craftsman homes are currently very popular and have been for years. She presented three periodicals on 1900 Craftsman homes: American bungalows, Arts and Crafts homes, and the Revival homes. She noted that she sees houses like these listed on the market, and, if fairly priced, they are purchased immediately. She commented that she would think that the profit derived from a renovation would be greater than that of one unit. Ms. Bourg then cited a passage from page 39 of the Downtown Design Guidelines (DTDG) of May 2006, under Multi-Family Zones: exes or triplexes located behind single-family homes are preferred over large-scale structures to maintain the small town character of Downtown neighborhoods and to retain the single-family residential She then read from page 61 of the DTSP, under Historic Preservation: The rich character of Downtown Pleasanton stems from its abundance of historic buildings that have been constructed over the past 150 years. The architectural styles, small town scale of buildings, and tree-lined streets all combine to create a setting Lastly, she read from page 76, #22: Discourage the demolition of single-family homes which exceed 50 years of age. The replacement of any single-family home should be compatible with the neighborhood scale and architectural style. Ms. Bourg then thanked staff for their assistance with the neighbors. Mr. Martin stated that he has been at all the hearings for this project and listened to the passion and emotion surrounding the old home. He agreed that Pleasanton does have a rich history. He indicated that he lives in a ho added that while it is a public benefit to everyone, it can be a burden to the owner. Mr. Martin noted that the City has a good method that requires an expert to evaluate the structure and arrive at a recommendation, and this procedure should be given some deference. He stated that in this case, the report concludes that the house does not rise to the level of recognition as a historic structure. He asked the Commission to weigh this in its decision. With respect to parking, Mr. Martin stated that the project has a good ratio with 59 parking spots for 13 homes, seven of which are for guest parking and 26 are uncovered. Regarding shading, Mr. Martin stated that ironically, the removal of the Deodar cedar trees might improve shading. He added that they tried to be sensitive to this issue when they proposed an open space area adjacent to the PV panels on the neighboring property. PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, February 9, 2011 Page 11 of 41