My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012611
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 012611
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/20/2011 3:59:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/26/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Stefano Iachella, Design Engineer for Verizon Wireless, stated that he was available to <br />answer questions on the project. <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired how far inside the property line the pole was going to <br />be located and if it was 40 feet. <br />Mr. Lobaugh replied that it would be located roughly 20-30 feet south. <br />Commissioner O’Connor stated that he assumes the 260 feet line was measured from <br />the pole to the northern edge of the site. <br />Mr. Lobaugh stated that staff measured up to the leased area and not up to the tower <br />itself. <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired if the tower would be 40 feet in from the edge of that <br />property or less than 40 feet. <br />Mr. Lobaugh replied that it is about 30 feet. <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired if there would be the ability for it to go 40 feet in. <br />Mr. Lobaugh replied that his instructions tonight were to discuss the appeal and that the <br />hearing would not be for a site planning review. <br />Gerry Gire stated that the Commission has received her letter in January and that she <br />would like to bring up two points: (1) Ms. Gire stated that contrary to the re-write of the <br />history by the Verizon lawyer, staff did not stall the project.She indicated that <br />Mr. Lobaugh has time and again failed to comply with staff’s requests in a timely <br />thndth <br />manner, if at all. She noted that everyone waited on June 24, July 2, and July 24, <br />and Mr. Lobaugh has never publicly presented a compelling necessity and alternate <br />location. She noted that tonight is the first she has heard about the determination on <br />the Sewer District property, which was suggested to him in April of the past year. <br />(2) Ms. Gire stated that changes to the master plan and City ordinances are processes <br />that the City has governance over and is not something that is the Planning <br />Commission’s responsibility. She asked the Commission to deny the appeal and not to <br />be threatened by Verizon’s tactics of re-writing history and threatening legal action. <br />Mr. Lobaugh clarified that they did meet with the Sewer District. He noted that at that <br />time, they were talking about relocating the entire site to an entirely new area within the <br />fenced compound and decided they could not do this as there is no room at the <br />southern end of the rectangle. He indicated that they also met with staff on-site to talk <br />about moving the facility slightly 10 to 20 feet and determined then that there was that <br />room available to them.He stated that they did not discuss relocating the site <br />completely to the opposite end. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 5 of 50 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.