Laserfiche WebLink
marketed appropriately. He indicated that Mr. Fleissig has done hundreds of thousands <br />of feet of retail and mixed-use developments, and he would not put in a unit that was <br />that narrow if the City is trying to get a successful retail space. <br />Mr. Wayland indicated that BRE has a different opinion. He stated that they are looking <br />at doing a development in the Mission Bay area in the San Francisco area close to the <br />ballpark, and it has a giant master plan that went through 20 years of extensive <br />planning. He noted that it specifies a depth of 40 feet in its neighborhood retail <br />mixed-use developments and that every major mixed-use developer is going in that <br />area. He added that they are also the developer of the Sunnyvale Town and Country, a <br />major project with 34,000 square feet of retail next to the Sunnyvale Town Center. He <br />stated that numerous consultants told them not to go any deeper than 40 to 45 feet <br />because users will want only 1,000 to 1,200 square feet because any more would be a <br />bowling alley. He concluded by saying that BRE is a mixed-use developer, that they <br />build in urban infill locations, and that he personally has built 200,000 square feet of <br />retail. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner O’Connor stated that BRE is proposing a depth of 40 feet, but this does <br />not mean that they cannot go to 60 feet if they find the right tenant. <br />There was consensus to recommend a retail depth of 40 feet. <br />Chair Narum indicated that the Commission has completed its recommendations to the <br />City Council and asked if there was anyone in the audience who wanted to make final <br />comments. <br />There were none. <br />Chair Narum inquired if any of the Commissioners had any comments regarding the <br />Negative Declaration. <br />Commissioner Blank suggested recommending that the City Council review the <br />Negative Declaration. <br />Commissioner Pentin moved to defer action on the Negative Declaration to the <br />City Council; find that the proposed Major Modification to the PUD is consistent <br />with the General Plan and the purposes of the PUD ordinance; recommend <br />approval to the City Council of PUD-81-30-48M/PUD-85-8-21M; and recommend <br />the following amendments to the Draft Hacienda TOD Standards and Design <br />Guidelines: <br />1. Encourage incentives for inclusion of a park whether relief of park in-lieu <br />fees or counting for private open space on Parcel 2 and Parcel 3; <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 46 of 50 <br /> <br />