My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012611
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 012611
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/20/2011 3:59:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/26/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chair Narum indicated that she would open the floor to comments on what has so far <br />been discussed so far. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE-OPENED. <br />Peter MacDonald referred to Mr. Tassano's description of the two options on the Owens <br />Drive lane reduction and noted that no one has had a chance to look at how to mitigate <br />this second alternative. He indicated that he agreed with Mr. Tassano's concern but <br />that he felt there are ways to mitigate the second alternative so it does not have to be <br />an "either-or" proposition. <br />Becky Dennis stated that she understands retail is not something market rate <br />developers want to do. She agreed that there are vacant spaces in the strip-retail near <br />the high density development in Hacienda, but she believes one of the reasons the <br />retail on Stoneridge Drive is not thriving is because it was designed for daytime workers <br />rather than for mixed-use. <br />Ms. Dennis stated that the City is designing a TOD here, and TODs are walkable and <br />adjacent to services and do not always go all around transit. She added that the City is <br />designing for the future where gas is going to be very expensive, and people will be <br />earning less than 50 percent of the County median and may not have cars; hence, it is <br />important to have more retail in the mix along Gibraltar Drive and Hacienda Drive. <br />Ms. Dennis stated that Gibraltar Drive is a nice, quiet street, and all types of things <br />could be done there for the neighborhood. She indicated that she would hate to see the <br />elimination of design guidelines that would allow the area to evolve into retail over time. <br />She noted that once small residential units are built, they can never be converted to <br />retail; additionally, it is a lot easier to figure out how to live in a loft or design space that <br />was commercial or retail space to make it livable residentially than it is to convert <br />residential into retail later. She stated that this area should be preserved for Hacienda <br />retail as people will come to appreciate a more urban environment where they can walk <br />to services. <br />Valerie Arkin, Task Force member and School Board member, note that the Task Force <br />talked about this for a long time. She agreed with Ms. Dennis’ comments regarding <br />retail on Gibraltar Drive and what TOD will bring to the community in the future. She <br />added that retail could serve the existing residences in Hacienda, including those from <br />the Valencia development. She indicated that the School District demographers’ report <br />was based on 30 units per acre rather that 55 units per acre. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Blank commented that if the strip mall at Stoneridge Drive and Gibraltar <br />Drive were thriving, it would be more persuasive. He indicated that he goes there often <br />and it is fairly dead. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 37 of 50 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.