My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012611
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 012611
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/20/2011 3:59:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/26/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioners Olson, Pearce, and Pentin agreed as well. <br />There was consensus: <br />that if BRE does the trails, the setbacks would be reduced as proposed by <br />Mr. Wayland; <br />to provide incentives for land set aside for public parks; and <br />to include a sunset clause if there is not significant progress at the time the <br />application is set. <br />Residential density: need for an average density to be included in the TOD Standards <br />and Guidelines <br />Chair Narum stated that the density range is currently 30-55 units per acre. <br />Commissioner Pearce indicated that there was a lot of discussion about density at the <br />Task Force meetings and that she is comfortable with these numbers. <br />Chair Narum stated that she supported restricting the density to an average of 35 units, <br />particularly for Parcel 2, because it is across from the residents. <br />Commissioner O’Connor stated that Mr. Wayland had indicated that it will not be <br />feasible to go much over 30 units per acre to begin with because of the costs. He <br />indicated, however, that he thinks a minimum of 30 units should be kept in order to meet <br />what the City needs for the court settlement. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he was not certain about the value of putting that <br />restriction. <br />Chair Narum noted that the way the document is written, all three parcels could be <br />developed at 55 units per acre, which would be 1,500 units versus 800 units. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that even if an applicant came in with 55 units and meets <br />the guidelines, the City still has the discretion to modify the application. <br />Commissioner O’Connor stated that he thinks the Commission would want to give the <br />developer a heads-up and not have the developer go through all the expense. <br />Chair Narum stated that Parcel 2 could have an overall average density not to exceed <br />35 units, so one part could be 25 units and another would be ten units. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she feels what the Commission sometimes does is <br />pick numbers out of the air and hope they are right. She indicated that she would rather <br />keep it where it is at, have an applicant come to the City, and look at the actual project. <br />Commissioner Blank agreed and stated that it seems like micromanaging. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 30 of 50 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.