My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012611
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 012611
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/20/2011 3:59:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/26/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Blank commented that it seems like a long time that the best that can be <br />done is to start construction 1.5 years from now. <br />Commissioner O’Connor stated that he thinks staff would believe that is a pretty good <br />timeline. <br />Mr. Whalen reiterated that BRE needs definite guidelines it can work with, stating that it <br />would be a shame to go through the process for nine months and then adopt guidelines <br />from which he will be requesting a variance in two months. He brought up, as an <br />example, the matter of reduced setback with enhanced landscaping or open space. He <br />indicated that he looks at this as an opportunity to negotiate, with the guidelines not <br />meaning anything and turning a six-month approval process into a year. <br />John McPartland, District 5 BART Director and Task Force member, stated that BART <br />endorses the guidelines and complimented the facilitator in his effectiveness. He noted <br />that the input was varied, often contentious but cordial, and the process was complete, <br />resulting in an end product that is the best available from the heart and soul of the <br />community and the best professional judgment from a business perspective. He <br />indicated that BART intends to be an active and participative partner in moving forward. <br />Referring to Parcel 1 and the design guidelines for Owens Drive, Commissioner Pentin <br />asked Mr. McPartland where BART is with regard to development on the BART parking <br />lot and property. <br />Mr. McPartland replied that he is not in a position to permanently give up any parking <br />spaces. He added that whatever development comes forward on the north side of <br />Owens Drive should be mimicked on the south side in order to achieve balance. <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that currently, the plan indicates that Parcel 1 will <br />potentially be developed soon while the other side of the street may not be on board for <br />another five to twenty years. He inquired how this might affect what is done on Parcel 1 <br />both sides of the street would not come together at the same time. <br />Mr. McPartland replied that he would personally be involved in this if it happens <br />immediately. He indicated that he is very proactive in relation to supporting the Iron <br />Horse Trail integration into the plan, and he wants to help facilitate that in any way he <br />possibly can. He added that he would like to see a more detailed effort put into this. <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that the opportunity to take Owens Drive and try to turn it <br />into a quieter, slower, retail/residential street versus what it is today will require support <br />from both sides of the street. He inquired if BART would come in at the same time to <br />develop the north side of Owens Drive should a developer start work on the south side. <br />He inquired further if this would be a priority for BART and if BART would be willing to <br />partner in at the same time. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 23 of 50 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.