My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN031511
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
CCMIN031511
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2011 2:39:33 PM
Creation date
4/20/2011 2:39:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/15/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN03152011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Actions taken to balance the budget include revenue adjustments; property tax increases as <br /> confirmed by Alameda County, sales tax increases by $1.1 million, increased sales tax <br /> revenues in Pleasanton, increases of $400,000 in hotel /motel tax, increase in building permit <br /> fees of $800,000, reduced delinquent property taxes by $300,000, less interest income, and <br /> reduced recreation revenues of $380,000. <br /> On the expenditure side, adjustments involve two categories; Personnel and Non - Personnel, <br /> which total $2.86 million. Personnel reductions are slightly over $2 million and are mainly <br /> attributable to the soft hiring freeze. Sixteen (16) positions are from retirements and attrition. <br /> Currently in the actual FY 2010/11 budget there have been 11 more positions that have retired <br /> and those positions have been eliminated. Therefore, through this process, 39 positions have <br /> been eliminated in addition to labor concessions. Non - personnel reductions of approximately <br /> $740,000 is due to electricity costs over and above what was projected, water and sewer costs <br /> for City facilities, travel costs, and contract services. <br /> Regarding the Water Fund, revenues are less than projected mainly as a result of the effective <br /> date of the water rate increase and reinvestment rates on reinvestment of idle funds. On the <br /> expenditure side, a soft hiring freeze for water personnel resulted in $412,000 and non - <br /> personnel costs include electricity, chemicals, and contract services is less. As a result, staff <br /> had originally projected a balanced budget and now the budget is about $500,000 less mainly <br /> attributable to the rate increase taking effect three months later than projected. Staff plans to <br /> make this up in the next fiscal year. <br /> The Sewer Operating and Maintenance Fund's reinvestment rates are similarly less than <br /> predicted. The soft hiring freeze and reduced electricity, chemicals, and contract services has <br /> resulted in the Sewer Fund remaining balanced due to no increase in rates, which is still being <br /> monitored. <br /> The Golf Course Operations Fund's revenues are less than predicted because of reduced green <br /> fees which are less than expected at $90,000. Expenditures are also down by $285,000 due to <br /> a reduction in fuel costs, irrigation, water and postponing leased purchase of equipment for six <br /> months. The Golf Course Fund balance is back to the level it is required to be and staff is <br /> predicting it will be around $1.1 million. Ms. Wagner said this is in compliance with the City's <br /> fiscal policies which requires two years of prefunded debt service, which is at $3 million, $2 <br /> million of which is reserved in the General Fund and $1.19 million reserved in the Golf Course <br /> Fund. <br /> Regarding next steps, staff has started preparing the next two year budget. The Council sets the <br /> priorities as April 14, 2011. Staff is hoping to meet with the Finance Committee to review the <br /> preliminary budget at the end of April. Staff has proposed 3 public workshops dates as a result <br /> of the public wanting to be involved in the process and also wanting to discuss the two -year <br /> budget, as well as a 5 -year forecast and plans to control pension and personnel costs. The <br /> budget would then be adopted June 21, 2011 and would go into effect on July 1, 2011. <br /> Mayor Hosterman noted that the General Fund adjusted revenues from $83 million in 2010 to <br /> $86 million in 2011, and she confirmed the City is still down considerably from a few years ago. <br /> Ms. Wagner noted that Appendix B to the report lists several years of historical revenue <br /> information. The high was $94 million in 2007/2008 and at $86 million the City is $8 million less <br /> than the City was in 2007/08. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 5 of 7 March 15, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.