Laserfiche WebLink
less than their current ordinance. They are still analyzing the new code, <br />but think that their recommendation will ultimately be similar to <br />Pleasanton’s. <br /> City of San Jose <br /> Going with CALGreen basic for now. After next year they will be looking at <br />o <br />offering an option for developers to go with a tier as an alternative to using <br />the third party system. <br /> City of Dublin <br /> Has a green building ordinance; is recommending CALGreen basic with a <br />o <br />local amendment to require PV prep on all new construction. They will <br />keep their existing ordinance for all other projects. <br /> City of Walnut Creek <br /> No existing green building ordinance; will be adopting CALGreen basic. <br />o <br />Mrs. Rondash indicated that the City is currently preparing a Climate Action Plan (CAP), <br />and it is possible that the Green Building Ordinance will need further amendments later <br />next year as a result of that Plan. She noted that the CAP will also be looking more <br />in-depth at opportunities for City incentives to be offered. <br />Mrs. Rondash presented staff’s recommendations as follows: <br /> Adopt CALGreen Tier 1 for those “Covered Projects” currently subject to <br />Pleasanton’s Green Building requirements; <br /> Adopt CALGreen basic for new Downtown buildings, and for new buildings not <br />located in Downtown which are currently exempt from green building. <br /> Adopt CALGreen, with amendments as appropriate, to incorporate the current <br />regulations on additions, and to continue to exempt historic structures. <br /> Amend the Pleasanton Municipal Code to incorporate CALGreen as the <br />reference standard. <br /> Adopt an alternative compliance option for developers to pay a verified third party <br />rater for LEED/BIG certification process as a substitute to the City’s green <br />building plan check review process and provide the City with proof of completion. <br />Mrs. Rondash then presented the following points for Commission discussion: <br />1. Staff’s initial recommendation <br />2. Additional local amendments (e.g., PV ready): <br /> Staff has received comments about the additional conditions of approval <br />which require a “greener” project. The Commission may wish to discuss <br />whether or not this practice should continue. <br /> The Commission can recommend additional local amendments to the green <br />building ordinance which would require some of the more standard conditions <br />(such as PV ready) and/or continue to add conditions on a case-by-case <br />basis as deemed appropriate. <br />3. Not requiring Initial pre-permitting review of the green building measures: <br /> Staff is considering a recommendation that Planning staff simply talk to <br />applicants about the green building requirements during an initial application <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, September 29, 2010 Page 8 of 21 <br /> <br />