My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092910
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 092910
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:30:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/29/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that would require best efforts of green measures to be implemented for each of those <br />buildings. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he agrees with the majority of the Commission about <br />including PV-ready into the Municipal Code. He inquired if this could be done and if the <br />proposal included adding this to the Code. <br />Mrs. Rondash replied that the proposal did not include adding this to the Municipal <br />Code and that this would be one of the amendments Council could direct staff to do. <br />She explained that one can imply or apply more measures than what is currently <br />stipulated in the CALGreen Code, but things stipulated as a minimum cannot be <br />removed. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired if this would be a major undertaking. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that this would not be a major undertaking, but it would reduce the <br />flexibility provided to the applicant. He explained that while it would count towards one <br />of the requirements, it would force the applicant to pick a certain avenue. <br />Commissioner Blank noted that every single commercial building he has seen as a <br />Commissioner, including the Consent Calendar item on tonight's agenda, require <br />“PV-ready with pull strings and pipes” as one of its conditions. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he is simply relaying to the Commission the feedback staff <br />received from virtually every group staff they talked to.He stated that staff supports <br />transitioning like for like into the new system but does not want to add to the <br />requirements. He indicated that while this may be minor, it does reduce some amount <br />of flexibility. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that the City would not be adding to the requirements but <br />rather making this mandatory as one of the four electives. <br />Commissioner Blank compared this to the requirement for sprinklers, stating that the <br />City is taking such a long time to approve an automatic sprinkler ordinance, and now <br />State code is mandating what the City has been implementing with Council guidance <br />from the City Council that sprinklers be installed in every commercial and new <br />residential buildings. <br />Commissioner O’Connor stated that his understanding from the minutes staff has <br />received feedback from developers that if this Green Building ordinance is approved <br />now, they do not want the Commission to “add on” further requirements. He indicated <br />that this would be a good opportunity to mandate PV-ready so applicants better <br />understand up front what is exactly required of them and are not taken by surprise. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, September 29, 2010 Page 13 of 21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.