Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Blank inquired if a 3,500-4,000 square foot home would change any of <br />the calculations. <br />Mrs. Rondash replied that this number relates to standard construction measures and <br />applying green measures. She noted that the City’s current Green Building Ordinance <br />would apply to a 3,500-square-foot home in the same way as CALGreen would apply to <br />a 3,500-square-foot home.She added that the City would not anticipate any price <br />change for construction. <br />Mr. Corbett noted that the question of cost came up at the Chamber of Commerce’s first <br />meeting with stakeholders, and this was the initial information from the CBIA. He added <br />that staff then reviewed a study done by a consultant in Alameda County who looked at <br />different types of projects, specifically 3,500- and 4,500-square-foot homes in the City’s <br />climate zone, and the numbers for the 2,500-square-foot home were fairly comparable. <br />He indicated that in both commercial and residential structures, the larger the structure <br />the greater the cost reduction and payback time. <br />Chair Olson noted that the staff report did not reference a 3,500- to 4,500-square-foot <br />increase. He stated that he took the expensive side of those ranges, added it up, <br />divided it by 2,100 square feet, and he arrived at a cost per square foot increase of <br />$3.17. He inquired how staff arrived at $1.67 to $2.14 per square-foot increase. <br />Mr. Corbett replied that the figures were provided by CBIA to staff in mid-August. He <br />noted that CBIA, along with the AIA and other organizations, has been involved in the <br />development of the code from the start. He indicated that CBIA is a stakeholder in <br />developing the code and that they represent the builders and are supportive of cities <br />going to the Tier 1 measures. Mr. Corbett added that costs would rise dramatically as <br />one chooses the high end of construction materials. He used as an example the range <br />of costs for toilets, depending on the type. <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired if having two different water meters for domestic use <br />and for exterior use is an option or a requirement. <br />Mrs. Rondash replied that it is a requirement listed in the CALGreen Code. She added <br />that staff would be amending it to indicate that separate water meters would be required <br />for indoor water and for outdoor water to meet the Tier 1 standard. <br />Ms. Stern clarified that this is an amendment staff is suggesting. <br />Mr. Corbett noted that having separate meters is a non-residential requirement and not <br />a residential requirement. He added that it is currently a common practice and <br />mandated for non-residential projects with over 5,000 square feet of landscape area, <br />breaking it down to a smaller threshold or to 1,000 square feet of landscaped area. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, September 29, 2010 Page 10 of 21 <br /> <br />