My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092210 Special Meeting
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 092210 Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:28:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/22/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Lobaugh replied that he believes T-Mobile’s coverage objective is generally <br />southward, which points away from all of the trees. <br />Stefano Iachella, Radio Frequency (RF) Engineer for Verizon Wireless, stated that he <br />was not sure why T-Mobile chosen that site but that probably T-Mobile’s coverage was <br />the Business Park. He indicated that Verizon’s intended coverage is not the Business <br />Pak but residences to the north, and it is difficult to find places to site their location <br />outside residential areas. He added that the regional search ring for the site was farther <br />north than where they settled, and they have exhausted everything in that area and <br />settled on this location which has no trees on the northern and eastern portion of the <br />plot. He noted that they can get their signal into residential areas to the north. <br />Chair Olson inquired if the lease was signed with the City before or after they met with <br />the neighbors. <br />Mr. Lobaugh replied that it was signed before they met with the neighbors. <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that the visual taken by Verizon from Monterey Court was <br />not included in her packet. She inquired if this was taken recently. <br />Mr. Lobaugh replied that the photo was provided about three to four months ago. <br />Ms. Soo confirmed that the photo was submitted to staff but was not forwarded to the <br />Commission. <br />Gerry Gire stated that she is one of the residents on Monterey Court and that she had <br />drafted a letter sign by residents of the Court opposing Verizon’s request. She indicated <br />that she has since obtained an additional 16 residents’ signatures, and also submitted a <br />letter herself in opposition to the proposal. She read the letter into the record as follows: <br />“On behalf of residents on or near Corte Monterey, we were pleased to hear the <br />Planning Commission had denied the Verizon application to place to cell phone <br />tower in the adjoining Bernal Corporate Park. A number of us have been working <br />with Jenny Soo, Associate Planner, on evaluating the impact of this project on our <br />neighborhood and families. <br />“After months of requesting to meet with the applicant, we were finally able to get the <br />parties together with Ms. Soo’s help on June 9, 2010 in the hopes of openly <br />exchanging information and concerns. We were pleased to have Ms. Janice Stern, <br />Planning Manager, take the time to attend our on site (in Corte Monterey) meeting <br />along with Verizon representative, Mr. Mark Lobaugh, Project Manager (Complete <br />Wireless Consulting, Inc.). We spent well over an hour listening to Mr. Lobaugh and <br />asking questions to both the city representatives and Verizon. In an effort to look at <br />alternative placement, we even drove to Bernal Corporate Park to assess other side <br />options. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 22, 2010 Page 5 of 23 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.