My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092210 Special Meeting
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 092210 Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:28:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/22/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Narum also requested to see a visual simulation of what the tower would <br />look like from the back of the homes along Corte Monterey on the south side along the <br />trail on the Arroyo. <br />Mr. Lobaugh stated that they would need about two weeks to accomplish this. He <br />discussed how photo simulation is done and explained that it is not an exact science. <br />He indicated that it may not have the branch density or color, and reiterated they were <br />using very high quality and high branch count mono-pine. <br />Commissioner Narum asked the applicant to also provide a picture of what the mono- <br />pine structure would look like. <br />Mr. Lobaugh replied that he had provided staff with numerous photos demonstrating <br />what the tower would look like. <br />Commissioner Pearce modified her motion to include that the application provide <br />within 15 days, a written evaluation on how far south on the site they could move <br />the tower; additional photo simulation taken from the Arroyo adjacent to the site; <br />photographs of what the mono-pine tower would look like; and an evaluation of <br />coverage from the immediate building to the southeast of the site. <br />Commissioner Narum seconded the motion. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired how soon the item could be scheduled to come back to <br />the Commission if the applicant provides the information within that timeframe. <br />Ms. Stern relied that the item would have to be noticed and suggested that it be <br />continued to a date certain. <br />Commissioner Pearce amended her motion to continue the item to the <br />October 27, 2010 meeting. <br />Commissioner Narum seconded the amended motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Narum, Olson, and Pearce. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioners Blank, O’Connor, and Pentin. <br />Chair Olson called for a five minute break, and thereafter, reconvened the Special <br />Meeting. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 22, 2010 Page 13 of 23 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.