My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 071410
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 071410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:25:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/14/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Narum, O’Connor, Olson, and Pentin. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioners Blank and Pearce <br />The Minutes of the June 9, 2010 meeting were approved as submitted. <br />3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE <br />PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE <br />AGENDA <br />There were no speakers. <br />4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br />Janice Stern advised that an email was received from the applicant for PSDR-453, <br />Lemoine Ranch Estates, which is on appeal this evening, withdrawing the application <br />for a new subdivision identification monument sign. She added that the appellant, <br />Ms. Sorensen, would like to address the Commission and make a brief request that she <br />be informed of any future proposals on this property. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Lynn Ann Sorensen stated that she heard about the applicant withdrawing the <br />application and requested that she be informed of any future applications for the site. <br />She indicated that she was not informed when the application was initially approved, <br />and she has a deed restriction that specifically states that monument signs are not to be <br />constructed on the property in question. She added that the developer had applied for a <br />sign once before this when the development was built, and the City had denied it due to <br />the deed restriction. <br />Commissioner O’Connor noted that this application was approved on the Zoning <br />Administrator level and inquired if the City will be able to manage the notification <br />requested by Ms. Sorensen. <br />Ms. Stern said yes. <br />Ms. Sorensen stated that she has experienced identity theft and theft of her mail and <br />that if she did not show up at a meeting in the future, it would mean she did not receive <br />the notice. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 14, 2010 Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.