My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052610
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 052610
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:22:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/26/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Pearce noted that one speaker mentioned air monitoring at Mohr <br />Elementary School. She inquired if this has been discussed and if this was feasible. <br />She stated that she has seen surveys for pollution in elementary schools, some of them <br />adjacent to major roadway such as Alisal Elementary School. <br />Ms. Giffin replied that the California Air Resources Board recommends that these <br />studies are to be done once the road reaches 100,000 ADT, and Stoneridge Drive is <br />substantially less than that, which is the reason it is not recommended as mitigation. <br />Chair Olson noted that one speaker mentioned that there was not sufficient time to <br />review the documents. He inquired what the requirement is for review and if the City <br />has met it. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that the minimum time that the SEIR must be available is ten days. <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired if staff tries to exceed that limit when there are <br />hundreds of pages of documentation or for larger projects. <br />Mr. Dolan replied staff definitely padded that requirement by bringing the document to <br />the Planning Commission and added that there will be additional time between now and <br />when it comes before the City Council. <br />Commissioner Olson requested confirmation that the original EIR was available for over <br />a year. <br />Commissioner O’ Connor commented that, however, it is not the original EIR but the <br />SEIR that is subject to review, <br />Mr. Dolan stated that the original EIR has been available for considerably longer than a <br />year. <br />Commissioner O’Connor stated that there has been much controversy about the <br />biological aspects of the SEIR. He noted that the Commission had heard from Mr. Kanz <br />of the Alameda Creek Alliance about the 5:1 ratio, and the applicant’s biological expert <br />came up to present his findings. He requested Chair Olson to re-open the public <br />hearing to give Mr. Kanz an opportunity to respond to the biological expert’s comments <br />about the 1:1 ratio. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE-OPENED <br />Commissioner Pearce clarified that the public hearing is limited to just this one issue. <br />Mr. Kanz stated that he is on the User Advisory Group of the East Alameda County <br />Conservation Strategy. He indicated that the City of Pleasanton is represented on the <br />Steering Committee by Ms. Janice Stern and that the County has its own representative <br />on the Committee as well. He indicated that the group has been working for two years <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 26, 2010 Page 21 of 27 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.