My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052610
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 052610
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:22:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/26/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mike Tassano stated that the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC) identifies only one <br />roadway segment which a vehicle exceeding three tons can utilize, and that is the <br />segment on Sunol Boulevard/First Street/Stanley Boulevard, which is an established <br />truck route. He added that the provisions in the PMC prohibit any vehicle over three <br />tons from using any roadway within Pleasanton except when delivering to a set location; <br />for example, the PMC would prohibit a truck exceeding three tons from exiting on <br />El Charro Road, to Stoneridge Drive, and back on I-680 to bypass the I-580 <br />congestion. He noted that this PMC provision is not planned to be changed. He <br />indicated, however, that vehicles legally have the right to be on the roadway to deliver to <br />the auto mall or another establishment along Stoneridge Drive. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired if this could become a Code enforcement issue. <br />Mr. Tassano replied that staff has conditioned previous development projects <br />concerning truck routes. He added, however, that it cannot be done, for example, if <br />there were an existing concrete company on Stoneridge Drive. <br />Commissioner Pentin inquired if a truck exceeding three tons delivering to CLC could <br />get off at Stoneridge Drive, drive across town, and come across the bridge. <br />Mr. Tassano replied that the PMC stated that these trucks must use the most direct <br />route. He noted that this is the same procedure staff requires for construction projects. <br />Commissioner Pentin inquired if it can be stipulated that deliveries must come via <br />El Charro Road. <br />Mr. Roush replied that this is possibly already part of the PUD conditions that the <br />Commission has looked at. He added that staff can certainly look at that and make a <br />final recommendation to the City Council on whether or not that is the kind of condition <br />that is appropriate to impose. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she recalls when the Commission considered the <br />Home Depot project, there was a discussion about restricting truck routes through the <br />city, and there was a discussion that when one roadway is specifically restricted from <br />having trucks of a certain tonnage other than over three tons, another truck route must <br />be designated. She inquired if this was accurate. <br />Mr. Tassano replied that he believes that situation came about because the proposed <br />Home Depot just happened to be on the City truck route. He explained that delivery <br />trucks could exit on Sunol Boulevard and drive to the site; some preferred that these <br />deliveries be via SR-84. He added that there was a discussion about eliminating the <br />established truck route and establishing a new one. <br />Commissioner Blank asked staff about the request for additional paving. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 26, 2010 Page 18 of 27 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.