PC 042810 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Narum requested the addition of language clarifying that enclosed agricultural accessory structures outside the building envelope would be counted toward the 8,500-square-foot maximum floor area. Mr. Pavan stated that this would be included in the floor area ratio. Commissioner O'Connor indicated that this was covered in Condition Nos. 31 and 32. Commissioner Pearce noted that it was clear that enclosed accessory structures outside the building envelope would be included in the 8,500-square-foot maximum. Commissioner O’Connor inquired if the proposed condition regarding fencing included no solid fencing on the perimeter only or on all places of the lots. Commissioner Blank replied that the only reason he suggested no fencing on the perimeter is that a small fence might be proposed off of a house or around a hot tub for privacy reasons. Commissioner Narum noted that page 6 of the Landscape Design Guidelines states that fencing is not allowed along the perimeter of the lots, rather than fencing is allowed at the perimeter of the building envelope, and that it must be open fencing. Commissioner Blank amended the motion to allow only open fencing at the perimeter of the building envelope. Commissioner Blank and Commissioner Narum indicated that the amendments were acceptable to them. Chair Olson voiced his disappointment that vineyards are not allowed. Commissioner O’Connor also voiced disappointment that two lots were lost. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, Olson, Pearce, and Pentin. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: None. Resolutions Nos. PC-2010-07 recommending approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and PC-2010-08 recommending approval of Case PUD-87-19-03M were entered and adopted as motioned. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 28, 2010 Page 13 of 15