My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022410
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 022410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:17:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/24/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Soo replied yes to the first two inquiries but no to the third. <br />Citing the Happy Valley Specific Plan design guidelines, the 1999 PUD guidelines, and <br />the Serenity at Callippe guidelines of the same slide, Commissioner Blank inquired what <br />the Ponderosa guidelines were. <br />Ms. Stern replied that the last column shown is the actual development being proposed <br />by Ponderosa and which the Commission is considering. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired if Ponderosa exceeds the minimum required by the <br />Serenity at Callippe guidelines. <br />Ms. Soo said yes. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired why the Serenity at Callippe was allowed to have 30-foot <br />front and rear setbacks when the Happy Valley Specific Plan calls for 35-foot setbacks. <br />Ms. Soo replied that the Specific Plan allows for flexibility in terms of development <br />standards as long as the PUD meets the purpose and intent of the Specific Plan. She <br />added that at the time the Serenity at Callippe design guidelines were reviewed, Council <br />determined that it met the intent and purpose of the Happy Valley Specific Plan, and, <br />therefore, approved the guidelines. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that it would be helpful to have the Planning Commission <br />meeting minutes for that application for clarification and historical reference. <br />Commissioner Pentin proposed that Commissioners who feel they need the minutes <br />request them of staff through email versus having them be added to the packet. <br />Commissioner Blank indicated that he did not have a problem with receiving the <br />materials electronically. He added that not having the historical documents for the <br />project is the issue at hand. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that she did contact Ms. Stern and requested information <br />about the development standards for clarification and that she was satisfied with the <br />information that was provided. <br />Chair Olson inquired if the maximum FAR allowed for Serenity at Callippe is 25 percent. <br />Ms. Stern said yes. <br />Chair Olson noted that the average FAR for Ponderosa is 12 percent and inquired what <br />the maximum and minimum FARs were. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 24, 2010 Page 3 of 17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.