My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022410
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 022410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:17:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/24/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
similar to the Mariposa Ranch homes, he cannot confirm that every home meets the <br />design guidelines. He added that after the Commissioners looked at the design <br />guidelines the first time, they returned all of the books to staff to save on re-printing <br />such that they now have no copies of them. He noted that unless someone objects to <br />or appeals a design, the Commission may not know every detail and will assume it <br />meets the goals. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that the appellants sent the Commission documentation <br />that it does not have and that she cannot make a decision without the underlying <br />documentation. She noted that she is not indicating she has a problem with the Zoning <br />Administrator decision, but simply that she is uncomfortable with making a decision <br />without all of the documentation. <br />th <br />Ms. Stern proposed that the item be re-scheduled to the March 10 meeting, assuming <br />that staff can forward the requested information to the Commission in the next day or <br />so. <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that he sees in the documents that were shown that the <br />Commission does have a lot of reference to home sites and lots. He noted that if the <br />Commission starts talking about the merits of a custom home, he needs to know what <br />the Commission is defining here and how it applies to Serenity at Callippe. He <br />questioned if the Commission is back to defining homes, sites, lots, and what is <br />“custom” versus “tract.” He further questioned, if “custom” is something designed, <br />approved, and built for individuals as their personal, custom home, if this would <br />preclude anybody who has a lot from building what he or she wants for himself or <br />herself; or, if spec homes are not to be considered as custom homes because they <br />really are not built for specific persons.He indicated that if the Commission wishes to <br />discuss this, he would like to have a clear definition. <br />Ms. Stern reiterated that the design guidelines definitely do not preclude building a spec <br />home and selling it as a custom home. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he was not sure the design guidelines states that spec <br />homes are forbidden. He continued that if the process of customization is that a person <br />buys the lot and places an order, this would preclude spec homes. <br />Commissioner Pentin referred to Commissioner Blank’s portrayal of creating a custom <br />film and stated that he could make a custom movie by reaching back in his experience <br />of making films and use a template of a similar one he might have made in Los Angeles. <br />Chair Olson stated that he is distressed that the Commission did not receive all of the <br />information and that he supports not making a decision tonight. Having said that, he <br />questioned, if he bought one of the custom lots, then went to Ponderosa Homes and <br />bought the plan for one of the Mohr Avenue and hires a custom builder to build that <br />home for him on that lot, if this would be considered a custom home because he would <br />consider it as such. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 24, 2010 Page 15 of 17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.