My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012710
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 012710
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:16:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/27/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
conditional use permits to run with the land, and in this case, with the suites. She <br />indicated that staff has been sunsetting original use permits in the original suites or <br />parcels, and she requested the Commission to consider adding language requiring the <br />applicant to secure a new conditional use permit or transfer the existing conditional use <br />permit. She explained that this is a new process that does not happen very often but <br />which staff has done a couple of times, and staff wants to ensure there is not a lot of <br />duplication. <br />Commissioner Blank indicated his support for this process and believed it was cleaner <br />than having expiration dates on use permits. <br />Chair Olson agreed. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that the condition does not specify whether the use permit <br />would be for a new address or tenant suite and inquired if the new tenant space would <br />have to be in the same business park or whether it could be elsewhere. <br />Ms. Decker replied that in the past two projects where this has been done, tenants <br />actually went from one industrial park to another or from an industrial park to a <br />commercial site or vice versa. She added that the transfer would still come before the <br />Planning Commission just as if it were a new application. She explained that staff is <br />looking for a tool to have the original use permit at the current location expire and then <br />be moved essentially to the new location, whether in the same building, the same <br />complex, or at another site altogether. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired if it would not cause a problem if the additional language <br />included a clause that it would be subject to the approval of the Planning Commission.” <br />Ms. Decker replied that would not be a problem. <br />Ms. Harryman stated that it was staff’s intent to have the use permit transferred, but the <br />condition does not indicate that the use permit in the original site would cease. She <br />added that staff does not want to have a situation wherein a use permit is left at the <br />original suite when its tenant is moving to another location. She suggested that <br />language be added to clarify that when a use is transferred to another location, the use <br />will terminate at the original location and a new one approved for the new location. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that if the original use permit is terminated, then it cannot be <br />transferred and that if it is transferred, it does not terminate. He added that he believed <br />a new conditional use permit cannot be transferred to another location. <br />Ms. Harryman suggested that the language include the phrase “secure a new <br />conditional use permit” or a phrase that indicates that the original use permit lapses <br />upon transfer to another location. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 27, 2010 Page 7 of 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.