My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012710
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 012710
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:16:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/27/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Pavan replied that the City discovered during one of its periodic record audits that <br />the business had no use permit, after which the applicant was contacted and alerted <br />that he needed to file an application. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired whether Mr. Murphy had a business license. <br />Mr. Pavan replied that he was not sure but that one would need to be obtained if it has <br />not already been secured. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired where the business was located prior to its move to <br />Pleasanton. <br />Mr. Pavan replied that it was located in Hayward. <br />Commissioner Blank noted that on page 4 of the staff report, it states that 75 dBA is the <br />maximum permitted noise level. He inquired if the noise was measured from Kolln <br />Street. <br />Mr. Pavan replied that the noise was measured from the property line of the business. <br />Commissioner Blank noted that Condition No. 9 states that 90 days following Planning <br />Commission approval, the applicant would have to contact the Building and Safety <br />Division and Fire Department to determine all applicable requirements. He inquired if <br />staff monitored this through a tickler. <br />Mr. Pavan replied that was correct. <br />Commissioner Blank indicated that this requirement should be institutional rather than <br />personal and inquired what would happen if the planner were on vacation. <br />Mr. Pavan replied that the Planning Division has a system in which a planner who goes <br />on vacation designates a “buddy” who is briefed of items that need follow-up and acts <br />as a back-up during the project planner’s absence. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that Condition No. 5 states that truck pick-ups and <br />deliveries are limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. She inquired if this was only <br />on weekdays or also on weekends. <br />Ms. Harryman replied that if the condition does not designate days, it would legally <br />mean seven days a week. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired if staff is trying to limit deliveries to Monday through <br />Friday and if the applicant requested deliveries seven days a week. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 27, 2010 Page 5 of 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.