PC 012710 - Laserfiche WebLink

continued that the use permit runs with the land, and in looking at the building, the City may believe that a certain use may be appropriate for one suite but not for the entire building; therefore, the City wants to terminate the use within that suite when the applicant moves to another location, whether within the same building or across town. She indicated that staff wants to ensure that the use is terminated and will no longer be allowed at the existing location which evaluating that use as a new use permit in a new location. Chair Olson stated that this makes a lot of sense in the context of economic development; otherwise, a roofing contractor would have to move into the vacated suite. Commissioner Narum noted that another permitted use could move into that suite even if there is a use permit in place. Ms. Decker presented an example that Suite 203 currently has a permit for a roofer, and when the roofer vacates the site and a painter comes in, the site would have a use permit for a painter. She continued that should the painter leave and a flooring contractor comes in, that contractor would also be granted a use permit, and at this point, the suite would have several use permits in existence. She indicated that staff is trying to ensure that the impact of whatever type of contracting company that wants to occupy the suite can be evaluated by Valley Business Park as well as by the City in terms of the concentrations of uses within the building suites. Commissioner Blank moved to make the required conditional use permit findings as listed in the staff report and to approve Case PCUP-262, subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibits A with the following modifications: (1) Modify Condition No. 6 to restrict pick up and deliveries to Monday through Friday; (2) Modify Condition No. 12 to use the same language recommended by Ms. Harryman for the earlier application; (3) Add a new condition stating that the use permit for Suite 203 is terminated; and (4) Modify Condition No. 13 to require the applicant to obtain a business license within 30 days. Vice Chair Narum seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, O’Connor, Olson, and Pearce. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Pentin. Resolution No. PC-2010-02 approving Case PCUP-262 was entered and adopted as motioned. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 27, 2010 Page 12 of 15