PC 120810 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner O’Connor stated that he thinks the Code can be met by an industry standard material that has been around for a long time and can make the roof watertight. He noted that this is done all the time, and while not addressing a warranty, it meets Building Code. Commissioner Narum stated that she would concur that it would be undoing the agreement if all three panels A, B, and C were approved; however, not approving panel C is not undoing the agreement. She stated that she feels the Commission is being respectful in trying to work through a reality. She discussed her experience when looking down from the Krichbaum’s house which is higher at ground level than the Harveys’ house and believes it is a fair compromise. Commissioner Pearce said she would have supported the motion if it was simply to make the standing seam metal for panel A because there is a compelling reason to do that; however, she could not support having it for panel B. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Narum, Olson, and Pentin. NOES: Commissioners Blank and Pearce. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: None. Resolution No. PC-2010-42 approving Case PDR-932 was entered and approved as motioned. 7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS Commissioner Narum stated that as a result of the PDR-932, Jon Harvey application, it became very clear to her that the City needs historic guidelines regarding what is historically significant architecturally. She suggested that the Commission send a strong recommendation to the City Council that this be added to its 2011 Council Priorities. Commissioner Blank stated that he believed this matter was already on the list of Council Priorities. Commissioner O’Connor stated that he thinks another message should be sent as the Planning Commission has also recommended a fire sprinkler ordinance as a Council Priority, and this has not been done. Commissioner Pearce inquired when the Council sets its priorities. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, December 8, 2010 Page 19 of 23