Laserfiche WebLink
would review when the more detailed improvement plans are submitted. He stated that <br />Issues relating to the additional two-foot bike-lane buffer are another point that Mr. <br />Tassano would have to weigh in on; however, that may not be accommodated by the <br />way the roadway is currently configured. <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that this is a great opportunity now to decrease the size of <br />the travel lanes in order to gain another two feet in the street. He added that the <br />roadway will become busy, and bringing in bike traffic, and if done right, will allow <br />bicyclists to travel through a community park and senior housing and would encourage <br />a better bike and pedestrian community. He expressed concern that once the roadway <br />is in, this will not be able to be done because of the cost. <br />Mr. Bocian stated that he could not address the question relative to reducing lane <br />widths for the purpose of accommodating two-foot buffers and reiterated that this is <br />something Mr. Tassano has to weigh in on. He added that if it was the interest of the <br />Commission to incorporate these, staff could have it reviewed by Mr. Tassano and <br />report back to the Commission, or a condition could be incorporated within the approval <br />of the Tentative Map that directs the City Traffic Engineer to review these matters and <br />make appropriate changes. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that a third option would be to include this as a strong <br />recommendation for when the item goes before the City Council. <br />Mr. Bocian advised that the item would not move forward to the Council. <br />Commissioner Blank voiced support for Commissioner Pentin’s comments and <br />suggested that a condition be added indicating it should be done and that if it cannot <br />happen, the Traffic Engineer should return and state why it cannot happen. <br />Vice Chair Narum supported Commissioner Pentin’s comments but indicated that she <br />was not that familiar with the Master Plan. She suggested that the item be continued so <br />Commissioner Pentin could meet with Mr. Tassano and try to get the appropriate <br />provisions of the Plan incorporated into the Map and then returned to the Commission. <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired about the time line for Staples Ranch. <br />Mr. Bocian replied that staff is scheduled to submit the application to LAFCO by <br />November 12, 2010; then bring it before LAFCO on January 13, 2010. He noted that <br />approval of the Tentative Map should be completed before the application is submitted <br />to LAFCO. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she finds Commissioner Pentin’s point salient and is <br />glad it was brought up. She indicated that she believes the issue needs to be in <br />conformance with the Pleasanton Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and that <br />Mr. Tassano was also very invested in this Plan. Given this and the Commission’s <br />timeline, she recommended that a condition be incorporated that states that it must be <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, October 27, 2010 Page 13 of 17 <br /> <br />