Laserfiche WebLink
Wes Sullens, Stopwaste.org, clarified that more important is what constitutes the definition of <br /> Tier 1 measures, and he provided examples stating Tier 1 has a list of required pre- requisites <br /> above and beyond the mandatory code, a menu of options to select, and some required pre- <br /> requisites which are vague without definition. One example is impermeable paving, which is a <br /> 20% requirement and lower than any green building standard. There is an exemption for <br /> driveways and walkways with patios which are not an exemption in the other rating systems. <br /> Radiant roof barriers are standard practice and code in most projects built in the City. There is a <br /> vague measure about radiant hydronic heat as being innovative without definition of why it is a <br /> green measure of what it specifically means. A main issue that illustrates the problems is <br /> flooring systems —a measure requires a certain amount of toxic emissions from flooring <br /> materials as certified by the Collaborative for High Performance Schools, and this list is no <br /> longer live on the website and is no longer being administered. Without leadership from the <br /> State, it falls on staff to determine definitions for green building measures. The whole idea from <br /> the Tier program was to have a consistent green building standard above minimum code, and if <br /> this is defined in each jurisdiction, it makes it difficult to have consistency. He also said green <br /> point rated and LEED both allow things that track performance in buildings and can tie them <br /> back to Climate Action Plans to show that by building it green, you are saving emissions in <br /> energy, water, and waste. Lastly, they just produced a guidebook on LEED projects which is <br /> how to document the mandatory measures of CalGreen on LEED projects because there is a lot <br /> of duplication and it is not yet clear how to do this. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan said staff has done an evaluation of points and determined that from a <br /> point standpoint, Tier 1 is roughly equal to the City's existing ordinance requirements. He is <br /> concerned that this might not be a good enough comparison, and questioned whether it is <br /> vague and requires more interpretation. Mr. Sullens said he believes they are largely similar in <br /> that aspect. He noted that Build It Green did their own analysis of CalGreen Tier 1 and the score <br /> they arrived at was more like 33 to 34 points and slightly less than equivalent certification. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan questioned whether procedures and protocols would be clarified. Mr. <br /> Sullens said it is hard to say; the one procedure out for non - residential provides for more clarity <br /> but it still adds a level of flexibility that is not there in the green point rating system. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan questioned why the State released the mandate without providing all of <br /> the information cities need to do it. Mr. Sullens said he believes that the tiers were considered <br /> the parking area for measures thought to be too aggressive and for developers to have a <br /> checklist they could approach cities with. It was a place to put things that may become <br /> mandatory in the future. He noted Stopwaste.org has been pushing for green building standards <br /> by the State. They got close to having green point rated and LEED being a referenced standard <br /> for the State by the EPA and others, but the Governor vetoed a bill and thought it could be done <br /> in the State code, and this is what exists today. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan cited comparisons mentioned from other cities, and he questioned <br /> what Alameda County cities are doing based on Stopwaste.org recommendation to not abandon <br /> LEED and green points right away. Mr. Sullens said most cities are staying with their current <br /> ordinance. Oakland has passed a progressive one. Union City has a green point rated <br /> requirement and a Stopwaste.org small commercial checklist they developed for projects under <br /> the LEED threshold in terms of size and scope. Fremont, Livermore and Dublin are keeping <br /> their existing ordinances. There is a LEED ordinance in all civic projects in Alameda County and <br /> a few scatterings of private sector policies based on green point rated and LEED. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 15 January 4, 2011 <br />