My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
021511
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2011 2:52:49 PM
Creation date
2/10/2011 2:52:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Hosterman replied that discussion of the contract with the Pleasanton Employees <br /> Association will be on the Council agenda in two weeks, and any reportable action is publicly <br /> announced. <br /> Chris Mosier addressed Council concerning vacancy rates in retail and office space, <br /> replacement of downtown restaurants with massage parlors, high unemployment, budget cuts, <br /> analysis of the housing collapse, removal of government controls from the housing market, <br /> lobbying the County to provide refunds back to financially strapped homeowners, proactively <br /> reducing costs and provide rate decreases to homeowners for water and trash services, <br /> upholding the Constitution, and serving the people. <br /> Bart Hughes urged the Council to meet with staff and understand in union negotiations the <br /> differences between AVA valuation versus MVA evaluation, stated the new contract in June /July <br /> timeframe was based on pararneters set before the new CaIPERS information came out which <br /> was substantially higher than planned, and asked for collective sacrifice. <br /> Mayor Hosterman reiterated the ability for public interaction in the budget process which is held <br /> several times throughout the year. <br /> Richard Endean requested that information be provided to the public prior to the January 18, <br /> 2011 Council meeting on unfunded liabilities, that the Council organize and support a public <br /> workshop to help citizens understand the City's financial situation, unfunded liabilities, pension <br /> and benefits, cited a Wall Street Journal article entitled, "When States Default — 2011" and read <br /> a quote from historian John Wallace. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> 11. Public Hearing: PRZ -55. City of Pleasanton — Consider the introduction of an ordinance <br /> to amend the Pleasanton Municipal Code to reference the California Green Building <br /> Standards (CalGreen) Code, with local amendments to address specific green building <br /> issues, and other related green building amendments <br /> Community Development Director Brian Dolan said the State of California adopted statewide <br /> green building regulations which the City is required to enforce which went into effect January 1, <br /> 2011. They are similar in content to what the City has, are part of the overall Building Code, and <br /> are procedural changes that allow the City to apply green building regulations. <br /> Instead of trying to tackle the complexities of enforcing and implementing the new green <br /> building code regulations on top of and next to its own green building ordinance, staff decided <br /> that for ease of implementation and understanding by public users, staff would combine the <br /> content of the two, adopt the CalGreen building code as required by the State, and make local <br /> amendments so that it matches as much as possible their current level of requirement. <br /> Currently two systems are used; one for commercial and public buildings which is the <br /> Leadership, Energy, and Environmental Design system (LEED), and guidelines provided by <br /> Build It Green for residential development. If the new approach is adopted under CalGreen, this <br /> distinction would not be in place. <br /> Both systems are point- based. There are various measures with which to implement projects to <br /> receive a certain number of points. There are also various checklists that describe the number <br /> of points achieved for each measure. CalGreen is not a point system. It is different in that they <br /> City Council Minutes Page 3 of 15 January 4, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.