Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Sullivan questioned and confirmed with Mr. Dolan that the Tier 1 does not allow <br /> self- certification by the developer for the entire process. <br /> Mr. Dolan confirmed that the Council's preference is to consider a version of recommendation <br /> number 2, which is to adopt the state mandate and review it in six months, with the hopes that <br /> the State will provide guidance for both commercial and residential building, and to not allow <br /> self- certification. Stopwaste.org would support this, as it would keep LEED and Build It Green <br /> and requirements for multi- family in place. <br /> Vice Mayor Thorne thanked staff for their work in melding the two systems together, supported <br /> review in six months for the sake of compromise, but was not interested in having multiple <br /> systems. Regarding predictability, if there is a project that meets Tier 1 and the Planning <br /> Commission and staff adds onto it so it may equal Tier 2, this is the way the process works, and <br /> the City always reserves the right to add things it thinks is applicable to projects. <br /> Councilmember Cook - Kallio noted the Council could make the 3 stories of residential more <br /> stringent, and she suggested the Council also define mixed use multi - family structures over 3 <br /> stories. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan proposed keeping existing LEED and Build It Green guidelines for <br /> residential, commercial, and multi - family, to adopt CalGreen basic, review evaluation criteria as <br /> it is received, and to determine the best way to implement this at the end of six months. <br /> Mr. Fialho restated the motion, which is to continue the Build It Green rating system for <br /> residential, commercial and multi - family projects and for staff to return to the Council in six <br /> months for further review. Councilmember McGovern seconded the motion. <br /> Motion: It was M/S by Sullivan /McGovern to continue the Build It Green rating system for <br /> residential, commercial and multi - family projects, and for staff to return to the Council in six <br /> months for further review. Motion carried by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Cook - Kallio, McGovern, Sullivan, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: None <br /> 12. Review and accept the Fiscal Year 2010/11 First Quarter Financial Report <br /> Director of Finance Emily Wagner reviewed the financial results for the City's Operating Budget, <br /> General Fund, Water Enterprise Fund, the Sewer Enterprise Fund, and the Golf Course <br /> Operations Fund for the first quarter of FY 2010/11 which ended September 30, 2010. <br /> Revenues: The City has received 5.6% of budgeted revenues as compared to 25 %. The <br /> difference is due to timing of receipt of funds, which she briefly explained. To note is in 2009/10 <br /> fiscal year, the actual property tax was $49.7 million. Budgeted for 2010/11 is $47.7 million. <br /> However, the first installment was received in December which is the same as last year. <br /> Therefore, the City could increase the 2010/11 budget which could be done at mid -year in <br /> February. <br /> Sales Tax: In FY 2009/10, $115.4 million was received. For FY 2010/11, budgeted is $16.2 <br /> million, or an 8.8% increase. First quarter receipts received were 17.4% higher than December <br /> City Council Minutes Page 13 of 15 January 4, 2011 <br />