My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 2002-64
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
PC 2002-64
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2007 4:53:41 PM
Creation date
4/16/2003 9:05:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/23/2002
DOCUMENT NO
PC 2002-64
DOCUMENT NAME
CITY OF PLEASANTON
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C. Assets. Onoortunities, and Barriers <br />In developing an action plan, energy-related assets, opportunities, and barriers in <br />Pleasanton were explored: <br />- Assets include the technically sophisticated and highly educated local populace; <br />local organizations; local schools; local media; local energy businesses; local <br />builders; receptive City, State, and Federal leadership; nearby governments and <br />agencies with experience; professional and trade schools and organizations; and <br />the City of Pleasanton's financial management skills. <br />- Oauortunities include Pleasanton's sunny climate; the "green building"/ "smart <br />houses" movement; interest in distributed generation, fuel cells, and <br />photovoltaics; wind energy resources located in the Altamont Pass; government <br />bonding capacity; regional alliances; organizations providing free/low cost <br />technical consulting services; grants; private financing opportunities; an educated <br />citizenry that draws private investment; new cost models that consider <br />externalities; and incubation programs for renewable energy projects. <br />- Barriers include those that aze opposed to technological change; bureaucracy; <br />utility and regulatory obstacles; public's resistance to perceived cost increases; <br />political considerations; private energy suppliers and providers; government staff; <br />State and Federal government energy policies; regulatory and legislative <br />uncertainties; lack of knowledge about existing programs; existing subsidies that <br />aze not aligned with local goals; and time limits on rebates. <br />For a detailed, expanded list of assets, opportunities, and barriers see Attachment C. <br />D. Implementation <br />An energy action plan is proposed in section E (below). EAG recognizes that further <br />development and planning is required before a specific action plan item can be <br />implemented. To serve this purpose, an Energy Committee shall be created by the City <br />Council who will further develop plans and recommendations for implementation of the <br />specific action items based on priorities set by the Council and/or the Committee. <br />Implementation plans developed by the Committee shall include a scope of work, <br />schedule and budget, and shall be approved by the Council prior to implementation. <br />Members of the Energy Committee shall be sanctioned by the City Council and work <br />under their direction for four yeazs, or longer, if the Council deems a longer time period <br />necessary. The City Council would provide the Committee with its change of <br />responsibilities. The Committee would have a chairperson and vice chairperson elected <br />by the Committee, would hold advertised public hearings, and would publish meeting <br />minutes. City staff would be available to assist the Committee in terms of meeting <br />logistics and coordination, preparation of meeting packets (agenda, minutes, and <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.