My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
011811
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2011 3:20:19 PM
Creation date
1/12/2011 3:20:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/18/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Sullivan confirmed that the noise level within a residence's bedrooms would <br /> then be roughly 64 decibels, sometimes occurring at 2 a.m., and noted that decibels increase on <br /> an exponential basis. <br /> Councilmember Cook- Kallio said she walked the property and confirmed with staff that the <br /> setbacks of the three homes in question are fairly consistent with almost all development in the <br /> immediate area. She asked how the proposed sound wall compares to that behind the existing <br /> development to the east. Mr. Otto said it is similar in height. Based on the sound attenuating <br /> windows, he guessed the proposed homes would have higher sound reduction than those <br /> currently along the railroad tracks. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan inquired as to the qualifications of the consultant who prepared the <br /> shadow study. Mr. Otto said the applicant's architect prepared the study. Councilmember <br /> Sullivan noted an architect is not a photovoltaic engineer. He said he prepares studies like this <br /> in a professional capacity and questioned its technical validity and noted that PV systems are <br /> particularly sensitive to shadow and as little as 10% of the modules situated in shadow can <br /> significantly decrease the output of the entire array. <br /> Councilmember Thorne disclosed that he met with the property owner, walked the property, and <br /> met with a representative of the PHA. He asked if any densities, other than what is proposed <br /> tonight, were considered at the Planning Commission workshop. Mr. Otto said another 14 unit <br /> plan, similar to this, was reviewed. <br /> Community Development Director Dolan said some Commissioners were interested in reducing <br /> the number of lots to accomrnodate guest parking more easily. Ultimately, the applicant was <br /> able to do so with some other redesign and the Commission seemed to be satisfied. <br /> Councilmember Thorne asked if the park off Del Valle is large enough to include play <br /> equipment, if it does not already. Mr. Dolan said it is not large enough and is constrained by an <br /> existing home that runs along side of it. The Specific Plan also calls for future improvements to <br /> accommodate parking to support the trailhead adjacent to it. <br /> Councilmember McGovern confirmed with staff that the rezoning would support a density <br /> greater than eight units per acre, and does not require the 12 units per acre currently proposed. <br /> She asked what size lot would be needed to accommodate retention and renovation of the site's <br /> existing home. Mr. Otto said the Council could approve whatever setback it wishes around the <br /> home with a PUD developrnent and the lot size could vary. Councilmember McGovern <br /> confirmed with staff that retaining the existing home would cause some change to the circulation <br /> of the proposed development. <br /> Councilmember McGovern requested more information from staff regarding the portion of the <br /> site that was dedicated to the City in 1980. Mr. Otto could not speak to the origin of the gift but <br /> said it is now, and was then, a portion of Stanley Boulevard. Councilmember McGovern <br /> confirmed with staff that the dedication would not revert to the original property owner as part of <br /> this development. She expressed concern with the lack of green and play space for children, <br /> particularly with 3- and 4- bedroom units planned for the development. Mr. Otto noted that some <br /> models do not extend to the setback line and would have a larger rear yard, though some are <br /> conversely fairly narrow. <br /> Councilmember McGovern referred to photographs of the site and asked why more foliage is <br /> not included along the railroad line to buffer sound. She noted the development to the east <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 16 December 7, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.