My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
011811
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2011 4:04:22 PM
Creation date
1/12/2011 2:10:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/18/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT S <br /> These reforms would provide adequate and sustainable pensions for long -term employees in <br /> Alameda/Contra Costa County cities and enhance fiscal sustainability throughout the region. <br /> Next Steps <br /> Given that the two Management Associations have adopted these goals for pension reform, the <br /> following steps need to be taken: <br /> The City Managers Department of the League of California Cities has asked that regional <br /> approaches to pension reform be a topic of a panel discussion at the annual meeting in February <br /> 2010. The League Public Employment Committee and Board are also investigating pension reform <br /> recommendations on a statewide basis. Ideally, these efforts would result in a consistent policy from <br /> the League that can be advocated to the Legislature and Governor. <br /> The managers groups also recommend that Alameda and Contra Costa cities work with the League <br /> to seek legislative pension reform at the State level. These reforms should, at a minimum, include: <br /> ➢ Establishing a reasonable benefit cap for miscellaneous employees and safety employees, <br /> including retaining safeguards against spiking which creates pensions of 100% or more of <br /> final salary; <br /> ➢ Giving employers flexibility to determine when part-time employees are entitled to pension <br /> benefits; and <br /> ➢ Changing Ca1PERS Board membership to achieve better employee /employer balance and <br /> greater public agency representation; and <br /> ➢ Allowing existing employees to be enrolled in negotiated new tier plans on a prospective <br /> basis. <br /> The East Bay Division of the League of California Cities should advocate these changes to the <br /> League Board and to our State representatives. <br /> The working group identified further potential legislative amendments that could be important in <br /> overall pension reform efforts. They are not outlined here, as we focused on highlighting the factors <br /> most critical to local agencies. It will be valuable for individual City representatives to articulate <br /> other identified possible legislative changes of interest. We suggest that information be provided to <br /> the League Board through the East Bay Division, the City Managers Department, the Employee <br /> Relations Department and the Employee Relations Policy Committee. <br /> Short of comprehensive State action, any significant pension reform will only happen on a city -by- <br /> city basis. Individual city managers will need to discuss these recommendations with their city <br /> councils and seek direction to begin negotiating pension reform as labor agreements expire. In this <br /> way, sustainable and defensible pension plans will become the norm, over time, among <br /> Alameda/Contra Costa County cities. It is clearly understood that not all cities will reach these goals <br /> to the same extent within the same time frame. <br /> Members of the Pension Reform Task Force, listed below, are available as resources to explain the <br /> research and discussion that led to this recommended set of goals for local pension reform. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.