My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
011811
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2011 4:04:22 PM
Creation date
1/12/2011 2:10:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/18/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit E <br /> Proposal for Regional Pension Reform <br /> Alameda County City Managers Association <br /> Contra Costa County Public Managers Association <br /> February 2, 2010 <br /> Introduction <br /> After reviewing the work of several other regional California City Management associations on <br /> pension reform, the Alameda County City Managers Association and the Contra Costa County <br /> Public Managers Association established a joint working group on pension reform to make <br /> recommendations to our respective organizations regarding regional public pension reform. <br /> The need for such a working group is rooted in the following concerns: <br /> 1. The general state of the economy has sparked a public outcry over public pensions that may <br /> lead to overreaching and. inappropriate pension reform by statewide initiative. <br /> 2. The majority of current public pension programs under the California Public Employee <br /> Retirement System (Cal and most other public retirement systems in California are <br /> not financially sustainable. <br /> 3. It is important for cities in the same geographic region to work toward a uniform set of goals <br /> for pension reform so as to avoid an inherent competitive disadvantage in hiring qualified <br /> staff. <br /> The working group concluded that existing pension programs have worked well to support career <br /> local government employees for decades; however, there is a growing recognition that they are not <br /> financially sustainable. To that end, the public managers recommend a new tier pension offering <br /> that could be implemented by the great majority of cities in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties <br /> through the bargaining process. Such pension offerings would not affect existing employees who <br /> have vested rights to the current pension programs, but would affect new employees after a date <br /> certain and be both sustainable and defensible. <br /> As to existing employees, the public managers recommend that public employers require employees <br /> through labor negotiations to fund a portion of their pensions through direct payroll contributions. <br /> In these difficult economic times, this will create an immediate annual operating savings for public <br /> agencies as well as create more parity within the workplace as it relates to future new tier pension <br /> offerings. <br /> Background <br /> For more than 70 years, the State of California and local governments have offered a "defined <br /> benefit" retirement plan to employees. This system provides a guaranteed annual pension based <br /> upon retirement age, salary, years of service and the appropriate benefit factor multiplier. Most, but <br /> not all, municipalities in California participate in the California Public Employees' Retirement <br /> System (Ca1PERS). All municipalities in Alameda/Contra Costa County, with the exception of the <br /> Cities /Towns of Danville, Lafayette and Orinda and the Counties of Alameda and Contra Costa, are <br /> CaIPERS members. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.