My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
011811
>
10 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2011 3:18:09 PM
Creation date
1/12/2011 1:17:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/18/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
10 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 15, 2010 <br />To Whom It May Concern, <br />We are writing this letter in response to the recent approval on the second story addition at 6114 <br />Homer Court. We live directly next door at 6104 Homer Court. Prior to this we had heard about the <br />planning of this project off and on by the Lopez' but did not know they were formally moving forward <br />until a week or so before the hearing as we did not look at the card sent out by the city for quite some <br />time. It really did not come to our attention until Mrs. Persin came to our door to make sure we <br />received the card and to explain her concerns and issues which clearly concerned us as some of them <br />would be impacting us as well. From the beginning privacy was a 100% concern as the close proximity <br />of our two homes would mean the privacy of one half of our back yard would be jeopardized. Although <br />property value can be a subjective area, it is a definite concern of ours. We did go to speak to the Lopez' <br />regarding our concerns a few days before the hearing. They explained to us that there would be no <br />windows on the side of the house unless it became a problem with the back two neighbors. We let <br />them know we would be getting in touch with our realtor regarding our concerns on property values. <br />Unfortunately our realtor did not come out to our house until the day before the hearing to give us her <br />professional evaluation. After walking the perimeter of our home and measuring the distances between <br />the two homes it was clear to her that the value of our home would definitely go down not up. The <br />most significant issue being the obstructed view and overbearing shadow the new structure would cast <br />from the main front window of our home. Because our two homes are on the turn of the culdesac the <br />distance between the two front room walls is approximately 20 feet. As it stands now when we look <br />out our front window on the left all we see is the side of their home but at least there is open airspace <br />and natural sunlight. With the new structure we will no longer have that. This is the MAIN front window <br />of our home as we only have two. This is the focal point of our home. Apparently there were some <br />comments in the last meeting that we do not use this living room which I would like to clarify is 100% <br />untrue. This room is one of the main reasons we bought our home as we both grew up in small homes <br />where children had to share bedrooms and did not have both a family room and a living room. This is <br />the room we use to entertain our family and friends and I use to meet with clients as I also work from <br />home. Regardless it is not out of line to want natural sunlight and an unobstructed view out of the <br />MAIN front window of our home. This is how 1 bought it. In addition when driving up to our home it will <br />appear as a tucked backed home once again taking away from its curb appeal. Since we did not receive <br />this information from our realtor until the night before the hearing and I was unable to attend as <br />planned due to childcare issues, my husband and I both made separate calls to Shweta Bonn the <br />morning of the hearing regarding our concerns. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.